10 ms·
>it's just Google's lame attempt at creating a loophole. That seems like sloppy terminology to me. I don't know why people want to call it a loophole. If you
by vba616 5y ago
>it's just Google's lame attempt at creating a loophole.
That seems like sloppy terminology to me. I don't know why people want to call it a loophole.
If you steal a cookie from the cookie jar, with the (accurate) expectation that you probably won't be caught, there is no loophole. At least to me, the word implies a hole in the rules, not an issue with enforcement.