4 ms·
It's not actually what the rule is, it's just Google's lame attempt at creating a loophole. It's not even clever, criminals have used the same idea, starting i
by kadoban 5y ago
It's not actually what the rule is, it's just Google's lame attempt at creating a loophole.
It's not even clever, criminals have used the same idea, starting in analog form, forever.
- vba616 5y ago>it's just Google's lame attempt at creating a loophole. That seems like sloppy terminology to me. I don't know why people want to call it a loophole. If you steal a cookie from the cookie jar, with the (accurate) expectation that you probably won't be caught, there is no loophole. At least to me, the word implies a hole in the rules, not an issue with enforcement.