4 ms·
While private union participation has sharply declined, public unions are still quite powerful and present a virtual lock on substantial changes. Witness the t
by starkd 5y ago
While private union participation has sharply declined, public unions are still quite powerful and present a virtual lock on substantial changes. Witness the teachers' unions. Particularly, their obstinance during the pandemic and reluctance to providing true school choice.
- TimPC 5y agoTrue school choice is an illusion as long as private schools are free to decline unwanted students that cost more to teach. The advocates of such policies tend to ignore the fact that it would leave disabled and other special needs students in a public system that no longer had enough other students to pay for their higher costs. That’s a problem that requires an adequate solution before any type of voucher is reasonable.
- starkd 5y agoA fair point. But the unions have been anything but reasonable on this issue. True, some have opened up to charter schools, but many have rescinded that option as soon as it was politically feasible. True choice can only happen when a different management of schools is in place. They have been obstinately against this.
- Dracophoenix 5y ago>The advocates of such policies tend to ignore the fact that it would leave disabled and other special needs students in a public system that no longer had enough other students to pay for their higher costs. People already pay for public schooling through income and property taxes, whether they're children use it or not. I don't see how your theory prevents higher cost students from being taught. It just sounds like you're advocating for a crab bucket.
- TimPC 5y agoEvery proposal I’ve seen for vouchers tries to tie the amount to average spending per student. My point is that’s fundamentally unfair because private schools are only interested in students that cost below the average to educate. They work hard to exclude and disqualify those with costly special needs. The result is you leave the public education system with all the high cost students but still getting the $X k they had per student when they had low cost students too. The net result of vouchers is raising the per capita cost of public education without raising the per capita funding. That’s unfair to everyone forced into using that system.
- Dracophoenix 5y agoIf you're issue is mainly with vouchers, then why not get rid of the need for vouchers in the first place by getting rid of limiting attendance by zip code? It's unfair for anyone, not just "high-cost" students, to be forced riders in an education system for which they have no agency. Fairness isn't determined on the basis of who in particular is negatively affected. Either the principle itself is fair or it isn't. The only solution compatible with choice and public education is to allow all students a free-for-all to attend any public school within driving distance. Tuition isn't usually the biggest or first barrier to entry in attending better schools, it's bureaucracy.
- TimPC 5y agoI think the follow-on effects of delocalizing schools can be pernicious. In the extreme case you can look at districts in Vermont and Massachusetts where some towns provide vouchers to other education systems instead of having one themselves. Having non-local education systems almost completely disconnects costs from funding. It potentially creates a race to the bottom where districts lower property taxes and make their own education system worse knowing that everyone can use other systems. Of course if everyone does that we set the entire region/country backwards a great deal but prisoners dilemma systems are seldom successfully solved.
- coryrc 5y agoStop holding 95% of students hostage to a tiny minority. They deserve better education. They deserve their teachers' focus instead of them having to devote inordinate amount of time to the mainstreamed special needs students.
- TimPC 5y agoAccept the 30% voucher that represents what a typical student getting into private school costs the system instead of demanding 50% as fair when that leaves the system too impoverished to deal with the students that remain.
- imtringued 5y ago
- randomdata 5y agoIn Ontario, the teachers ratified a three year contract in the spring of 2020 (i.e. COVID-19 was already raging), with the most notable feature being that remote learning would not be permitted, conceding to a paltry 1% raise in order to get the 'win'. Funny part is that they caved to the remote learning pressure in the end anyway.
- ohgodplsno 5y ago>reluctance to providing true school choice Interesting way of saying "I want poor children to go to school with poor children and rich children to go to school with rich children".
- irrational 5y agoDepends on where you live. Where I live the teachers union supported moving to remote learning overnight and remote learning continued until halfway through this school year. In fact it is still ongoing for those students who chose to do remote learning instead of in person learning. They plan on continuing offering remote learning as an option perpetually into the future. One thing they learned during the pandemic is that there are certain students who do poorly with in person learning but they excelled with remote learning. They want to keep supporting those students who learn better with remote learning than in person learning.
- starkd 5y agoPerhaps in high school level. But little kids, grade-school level, need in-person. They also should not be scared witless by mandatary rules that do nothing but leave them psychologically scarred for years to come.
- irrational 5y agoChildren are not so weak as you seem to think. It was children at all levels that showed remarkable improvements through remote learning over in person learning.
- ISL 5y agoThe position of, "we would like to have safe workplaces during a pandemic," seems utterly reasonable.
- tastyfreeze 5y agoThe argument against school choice us utterly unreasonable to anybody outside of the teacher's union. Their argument against is essentially that their pet school would go out of business because nobody would choose to go there if there were alternatives.