There needs to be a minimum threshold of creativity for something to be copyrightable. It's a low amount of creativity, snapping a photo at a painting is even

There needs to be a minimum threshold of creativity for something to be copyrightable. It's a low amount of creativity, snapping a photo at a painting is even enough for copyright of the photo of the painting being recognized by the photographer, but there needs to be some creativity. A computer isn't doing anything creative at all so shouldn't have any performance copyright. Calling a computer's work creative would be like claiming my pants are being creative when I put them on in the morning. It doesn't make much sense to me. The designer of the pants might have copyright, but the pants themselves do not.