3 ms·
These are interesting questions. If you write instructions you have the copyright to them. A computer program is a set of instructions for the computer. So whoe
by galaxyLogic 5y ago
These are interesting questions. If you write instructions you have the copyright to them. A computer program is a set of instructions for the computer. So whoever wrote the program has the copyright, right?
But whoever performs those instructions should have the copyright to the "performance" I think. So in principle I could think that the computer performs the instructions and thus can have the copyright to the "performance" but not to the instructions.
I'm thinking about music, and "scores" written by composers, but performed by musicians.
An interesting special case is https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4%E2%80%B233%E2%80%B3 https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/4%E2%80%B233%E2%80%B3 .
Do the performers have a copyright to the performance when they are following the instructions/score which says "do nothing". :-)
- staticman2 5y agoThere needs to be a minimum threshold of creativity for something to be copyrightable. It's a low amount of creativity, snapping a photo at a painting is even enough for copyright of the photo of the painting being recognized by the photographer, but there needs to be some creativity. A computer isn't doing anything creative at all so shouldn't have any performance copyright. Calling a computer's work creative would be like claiming my pants are being creative when I put them on in the morning. It doesn't make much sense to me. The designer of the pants might have copyright, but the pants themselves do not.
- galaxyLogic 5y agoYou are right