4 ms·
Nah? You don't put cruise missiles in space. You put mass in space. I supposed the point would be to hit the highest priority targets and nothing else. Loss of
by upsidesinclude 5y ago
Nah?
You don't put cruise missiles in space. You put mass in space.
I supposed the point would be to hit the highest priority targets and nothing else. Loss of command and logistics has a profound effect on endurance
- nradov 5y agoPutting mass in space as a weapon is just a silly scifi idea disconnected from reality. Even with modern reusable rockets, launch costs are still extremely high, especially if you need enough platforms to hit time sensitive targets. And the platforms wouldn't be survivable. There are cheaper, more effective ways to fulfill the mission.
- SAI_Peregrinus 5y agoNot to mention that you get at most as much kinetic energy out as you put in, minus losses to atmospheric drag and what's needed to drop the orbit (you have to burn retrograde to return from orbit).