4 ms·
That article mentions the downsides of switching from ST to DST, but doesn't mention the downsides of switching back. It's as biased as it gets. If you already
by WithinReason 5y ago
That article mentions the downsides of switching from ST to DST, but doesn't mention the downsides of switching back. It's as biased as it gets.
If you already know what outcome you want it's easy to assemble evidence that supports that position, but it's not science, and this article is one of the best examples of that I've ever seen.
- sampo 5y agoIt's a position paper. It posits an expert option, based on the research that is listed in the references. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Position_paper https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Position_paper
- WithinReason 5y agoIf the paper is not about deciding what the best option is, why did you link it?
- sampo 5y ago> If the paper is not about deciding what the best option is The paper is about the best option: "the advantages of permanent ST outweigh switching to DST annually or permanently".
- Wowfunhappy 5y agoThe author of the paper has examined the body of research and come to an informed conclusion, which they are sharing alongside their reasoning. Should the author instead present a case they think is wrong?