5 ms·
Maybe, but it's also very difficult to enforce a policy that everyone around you, including all your candidates, consider stupid and retrograde.
by coffeefirst 5y ago
Maybe, but it's also very difficult to enforce a policy that everyone around you, including all your candidates, consider stupid and retrograde.
- 0des 5y agoThis is not reality. The guy signing the checks has leverage, end of story. It doesn't matter who is shouting louder, the pen won't move.
- noasaservice 5y agoLabor creates. Always has, and always will. That capitalist check-writer? They can't do. That's why they hire.
- willcipriano 5y agoIt's never been easier to be a check writer, money printing with wreckless abandon, venture capital throwing money at anybody with a pulse. This is what a market with an oversupply of check writers looks like.
- noasaservice 5y agoAnd more to the point, there will be a capitalist check-writer that *will* accept 100% remote work because it will get labor to sign up with them. Reminds me of a LinkedIn post from a CEO that said they watched the "Return to Work" notices being hated online from competitors, and he'd send recruiters to employees recruiting and using remote as a reason to jump. Worked really well too.
- lozenge 5y agoLet's see if the CEO fires half his workforce then. If not, then he must have less leverage than you think.
- IshKebab 5y agoHe doesn't need to fire half his workforce all at once. That would be crazy. There's natural turnover.
- theshrike79 5y agoUnless someone will sign a check for remote work - as is happening now.
- whateveracct 5y agoThere's plenty of guys who will write me checks to chill from my home.