3 ms·
The precedent would be that it’s ok for the government to usurp your assets if they choose to. I don’t think that’s a good precedent.
by adrianmsmith 5y ago
The precedent would be that it’s ok for the government to usurp your assets if they choose to. I don’t think that’s a good precedent.
- trasz 5y agoIn response to a war or genocide. It’s a good precedent; it’s not that different from the usual economic sanctions.
- chii 5y agoi would be against usurpment - freezing is the most that should be allowed. Otherwise, it's too easy to justify theft, and next time it might not be some despotic dictator, but citizens.