3 ms·
One of the things I learned here is that Chernobyl still requires active cooling to some extent. The failure modes of nuclear fission power are just insane. Ye
by api 5y ago
One of the things I learned here is that Chernobyl still requires active cooling to some extent.
The failure modes of nuclear fission power are just insane. Yes I think it's true that coal has killed far more people, but the economic cost of just one fission plant failure is so high that one serious incident destroys the economics of the entire program. It also tends to make fission power privately uninsurable since once incident would bankrupt the insurance company within weeks.
How much renewable energy and storage could you buy for the containment and cleanup cost associated with Fukushima?
- jaywalk 5y agoChernobyl does not require active cooling today. It will be fine without power.
- Cthulhu_ 5y agoOther comments imply that the nuclear rods have been inactive for 20 years, and that passive - or even air - cooling will be fine. There won't be any runaway reactions or additional meltdowns, if that's correct.