4 ms·
I think this is misleading. There simply are not enough teachers in the us, largely because in a relative sense the pay is low. It’s easy to point the finger a
by avs733 5y ago
I think this is misleading. There simply are not enough teachers in the us, largely because in a relative sense the pay is low.
It’s easy to point the finger at unions- mostly because it is a narrative that has been pushed hard for years.
The issues are way larger than the person in front of the classroom. Bad teachers don’t help but thinking I can just take test data at the end of the year and figure out which teachers are bad is wildly useless
- zeruch 5y agoIt's not just a pay issue (although I do not want to under-emphasize its importance) but also of a professionalization and standards aspect. Both the Baltics and Finland have strict competency requirements for teachers, and national standards of quality. The US in many places is still arguing endlessly about Charter schools and homeschooling to allow 'teaching' the most woo-woo nonsense, and offer endless bloviating about testing batteries but nothing about curriculum/pedagogy requirements. Textbook publishers cater to opposing markets (California and Texas) and its just as adversarial as every other element of US society these days.
- 1123581321 5y agoI see your point, but think your jumping to arguments about unions and data illustrates the issue in the US. Finland has sidestepped much of the need for complicated centrally legislated or regulated reforms by elevating the professional stature of teachers, which lets more problems be solved entirely within the classroom. As you point out, our approach in the US requires the solutions to be more complicated and less trusting of the individuals best placed to make a difference.