6 ms·
My understanding is that we started buying them not because we necessarily needed Russian engines, but because there was worry that the collapse of the USSR wou
by simplicio 5y ago
My understanding is that we started buying them not because we necessarily needed Russian engines, but because there was worry that the collapse of the USSR would lead to a glut of unemployed Russian rocket engineers who would start offering their services to Iraq/Iran/N Korea/etc.
Dunno how well the program worked in practice, but it seems like a good concept.
- noisy_boy 5y agoCompared to USA setting up facilities on US soil for domestic needs and providing employment to them in those facilities ensuring that they become part of US aerospace infrastructure and bring know-how/self-reliance?
- major505 5y agoThis makes total sense.
- miki_tyler 5y agoThis reasoning never made sense to me. We always could have hired them directly, offer them relocation or simply set up a subsidiary of an American company in Russia to keep them busy.
- simplicio 5y agoJust paying people to keep doing what they're doing is going to be massively easier, and have a lot more uptake, then trying to move everyone over to some new company. Plus there's no guarantee you'd get enough of the original company to actually keep producing engines.
- gwbas1c 5y agoDon't just assume that people will move at the drop of a hat. Some people are happy to move around in their early adulthood (20s,) but once children and a significant other are involved, moving isn't appealing. Also, many Russians are happy with typical middle class life in Russia. Since the Soviet Union collapsed, typical middle class life in Russia was very good.
- miki_tyler 5y ago> Don't just assume that people will move at the drop of a hat. Same reason why they won't move to Iran or N Korea.
- blowfish721 5y agoYou also have to consider that they don’t want to move to the US specificly due to ideological reasons. How many who don’t currently live in Russia would love to move there if their profession was no longer needed in the US? Same thing applies the other way around.
- avs733 5y agopeople act in their own self interest, that doesn't mean self interest is simple Maybe North Korea offers them more money? Maybe Russia has a backdoor deal to have their scientists develop something 'for russia' that people know goes out the backdoor to Maybe Russia forces them to work on things or they will hurt their families. Maybe Russia won't let them leave and they are going to do worse things for money unless we keep them employed. Maybe they hate the US and want to work for their enemies HN often gets very reductive on why people make the decisions they do. Especially when those are related to decisions made by 'traditional' companies and state actors. Lets not assume that the entirety of the US state department and ULA aren't well informed about the decisions they are making.
- sterlind 5y agoI read in Command and Control that the Russian government narrowly managed to block a plane full of Russian weapons designers from heading to North Korea during the collapse of the USSR. There were brilliant scientists trying and failing to grow potatoes in their back yard because food was scarce. Moving beats dying of hunger.
- drekk 5y agoOn pretty much any metric that matters life is worse for the typical Russian citizen today as compared with before the collapse of the USSR. Educational attainment, lifespan, gender equity, homelessness rates, nutrition I'm not sure why people bring up that time as if it were somehow worse, turns out selling off all your public institutions to corporations at firesale prices isn't a good foundation for democracy. Many of those oligarchs that made out well became the powerbase of Putin, whom MI6 funded and supported. The West creates its own monsters
- thrashh 5y agoHiring then would have been outright punishment. America is more about everyone being self sufficient and most importantly, being a good trading partner. We think free trade is essential to prosperity. Remember that America spent billions of dollars on Europe and Asia after WW2 on reconstruction. Now America has some great allies (Western Europe, Japan, South Korea, etc.) all backed by consistent and reliable trade. When the USSR collapsed, America was kind of hoping they’d join the club. America literally thinks the club is really cool and everyone should be a part of it. Buying engines from Russia was about showing how trade is awesome and how both parties could benefit.
- drekk 5y agoAmerica only invested because they thought these countries would turn to communism otherwise. We don't do things out of the goodness of our hearts. Doesn't seem like we support free trade either when we've had wars over forcing other countries to let us sell Opium to their populace. At other times though like WW2 when our allies asked us to stop selling things to the third Reich all we cared about was free trade. Almost like it's a political football for whatever interests are more relevant to the American ruling class at a given point in time. The conflict today could have been potentially avoided had the West prioritized a democratic Russia vs one friendly to Western business interests. Instead our intelligence agencies funded and supported Putin, and encouraged him to brutally crack down on dissidents. We reap what we sow. Just a modern-day Pinochet
- throwawayffffas 5y agoI am not a rocket expert or anything, but my understanding is that Russian engines back in the early 1990s were more efficient. I remember seeing some kind of documentary on it. I think that it was also cheaper than building American engines, because there was a large stockpile of unused engines in Russia.
- jasonwatkinspdx 5y agoThe documentary was likely "The Engines that Came in from the Cold." And yeah, those RD-180 engines were a bit shocking to US engineers at first. I suspect there were several reasons that attracted the US to buying them, price being a big one.
- throwawayffffas 5y agoThat was the documentary indeed!
- gameswithgo 5y agoThe RD-180 is still by many measures the best engine that has been to orbit. SpaceX Raptor is putting up better numbers but so far has only flown short hops and test stands.
- treeman79 5y agoCheaper and smarter to just hire them and give them free green cards. NASA was born in large part from all the German scientist and engineers we wiped after the war.
- anamax 5y agoThe German scientists that came to the US after WWII were trying to avoid "going" to Russia or staying in post-war Germany. If these scientists are mostly happy in Russia, neither applies.
- FourHand451 5y agoThis logic was one of the reasons the Shuttle/Mir missions happened as well.
- olliej 5y agoAs I understand it, it was largely due to the superior efficiency of the Russian engines over the bulk of US engines, at a vastly better price than the US options of the time. Then institutional inertia takes over as switching rocket engines is apparently not just a trivial switch for a rocket design (but IANARS).