2 ms·
I don’t know how much that will help here. Most of the time that worked, the wars were at the end of a long supply chain (see Afghanistan for USSR, Vietnam for
by RcouF1uZ4gsC 5y ago
I don’t know how much that will help here.
Most of the time that worked, the wars were at the end of a long supply chain (see Afghanistan for USSR, Vietnam for USA, Afghanistan and Iraq for USA) and were not felt to be vital (see protests over Vietnam).
In Ukraine, the war is next door to Russia and easily supplied. In addition, whatever it means to the Russian people, Putin has a lot staked personally on this war. In addition, Russia will be operating with a lot less restrictive rules of engagement (the invasion itself is a war crime, so adding other war crimes on top of it really is t going to change a whole lot of opinion for them).
Rather I predict this will be like the Boer War or the US war in the Philippines where despite spirited local defenses, the resistance is ground down.
- nradov 5y agoThe USA never had a problem delivering troops and supplies to Vietnam and Iraq. They just docked cargo ships at secure deep-water ports and unloaded. Afghanistan being landlocked was more difficult to sustain a large mechanized military force.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]
- woajx 5y agoYa right who the fuck is going to want to go do business or work in Russia after this lunacy. They are on track to pariah state no matter what happens in Ukraine.