3 ms·
My only issue is things calling themselves a database when they are either a wrapper layer around an actual DB (most of the new "databases" I see posted) or as
by SigmundA 5y ago
My only issue is things calling themselves a database when they are either a wrapper layer around an actual DB (most of the new "databases" I see posted) or as in this case a storage engine.
Not trying to take away from the great work done here but the product name and link title would be more clear if it was referred to as a storage engine rather than a DB.
- marco_craveiro 5y agoGood point. Especially since the final destination is to merge into Postgres mainline in the future, it would make more sense to call this Oriole Storage Engine...
- thinkx 5y agoimportant distinction - this uses the Postgres Table Access Method to add an additional storage engine to the Postgres platform.. this is NOT a replacement for the current storage engine and can co-exist and be used on a per-table basis