4 ms·
Actually interception happens at the boost phase (upon launch) with these systems, so decoys are not possible unless you literally launch multiple rockets.
by kidme5 5y ago
Actually interception happens at the boost phase (upon launch) with these systems, so decoys are not possible unless you literally launch multiple rockets.
- bb88 5y agoYou mean the new systems? THAAD is re-entry or terminal phase. And decoys still exist in the midcourse phase. Wikipedia's definitions are what I understand about it. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missile_defense#Mid-course_phase https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Missile_defense#Mid-course_pha... With boost phase you have around 180 seconds to see it and to react to it.
- kidme5 5y agoNo, space-based.. Like Brilliant Pebbles. It's why Space Force is a big deal.
- hef19898 5y agoOh, so we think putting arms in space is a good idea now? there is a treaty against that, because if we accept that, anyone who is able to get objects into space can do some of the following: - Park nukes in space -> no launch, you just drop them on your enemy - Tungsten rods -> put a couple of tungsten rods into a launch satellite and have them rain down from space on your enemy Not sure that this is such a good idea.
- nradov 5y agoAt this point it's just a concept. There's nothing being actively developed. Putting nukes or tungsten rods in space wouldn't accomplish much. You can't just "drop" an object from orbit. Instead you need to conduct a burn to de-orbit and head toward the target. So it doesn't save much time compared to hitting the target directly with a missile launched from Earth. Launch satellites themselves would be vulnerable to anti-satellite defenses so they would be shot down early in any major conflict. And nuclear weapons can't be left unattended indefinitely; they require maintenance at least every few years in order to operate reliably.
- Johnny555 5y agoThat seems like a problem in itself, it needs to be on a hair trigger to fire soon enough to catch a weapon soon after launch. Sure would be bad to accidentally shoot down an unannounced manned rocket launch after the software thought it was a nuclear launch.
- arc-in-space 5y agoWell, I think the equilibrium here is that, all civilian rocket launches should be announced, not the worst outcome. Isn't this already the case?
- sterlind 5y agothis got miscommunicated once and led to Boris Yeltsin opening the nuclear football and weighing launch orders when the call came in that it was actually a Norwegian sounding rocket, not a surprise Arctic first strike.
- Johnny555 5y agoOh, so as long as the humans in every country that announce the rocket launches and the humans that enter known launches into missile defense systems do their jobs perfectly every single time, then everything will be ok.
- bb88 5y agoIt is the case, but aren't you then trusting your enemy to be honest? It would allow at least one warhead to get through the boost phase.
- bb88 5y agoThat's the problem decision time is so short. Missile defense is as it exists today is not a deterrent.