3 ms·

It's totally disingenuous to use phrases like logging in detail when there are no details to log. > if my guess was wrong... As I have previously said, you're

• Dylan16807 5y ago
  > It's totally disingenuous to use phrases like logging in detail when there are no details to log. That's not disingenuous. You disagree with me about what counts as "details to log". Nobody is acting in bad faith. > As I have previously said, you're totally wrong and your misunderstanding is so far from what I said that it's hard to understand how you got there. I made a post talking about the difference between a "CDN that tracks people" and a "CDN that doesn't track people". You responded by linking a specific CDN as an example of a "CDN that doesn't track people". So I guessed that you agreed that "CDN that tracks people" and "CDN that doesn't track people" are both things that exist. Why is that guess "so far from what you said that it's hard to understand"? You're saying you don't think that, so why didn't you just say "No CDNs can track people"? If every CDN is a "CDN that doesn't track people", then what use is it to link the terms of a specific CDN? If no CDNs can track people, then it doesn't matter what their terms say! - But as to your argument, I think your definition of tracking is too narrow, but I don't see any way to convince you otherwise so I'm not going to attempt that.