3 ms·
That’d do great things for consumers who don’t know about trademark law and suddenly start buying fake apple products at fake apple stores only to have their id
by johnebgd 5y ago
That’d do great things for consumers who don’t know about trademark law and suddenly start buying fake apple products at fake apple stores only to have their identity stolen and/or their bank account drained…
- Beached 5y agobut on the other hand, the damage done to the brand as a result would be enormous.
- hda2 5y agoyep, just warn citizens that the country will no longer be protecting Apple's IPs. Apple is now generic. Anyone buying apple products is responsible for the damages he or she sustains.
- MichaelApproved 5y agoAnd the damage done to consumers would also be enormous. For whatever faults they might have, the regulations are intended to protect consumers, not harm them with a scorched earth plan out of a libertarian fantasy. There are plenty of ways you can punish a company for wrongdoing without risking the consumer as much as that idea would.
- square_usual 5y agoCutting off your nose to spite your face.
- pjmlp 5y agoIn a way that is what already millions of people do in street bazaars, knowningly.
- amelius 5y agoApple can still use their name. But it has to be written in Comic Sans. >:)