3 ms·
> Of course, there is little hope. I think our hope are technical solutions: - No 3rd party cookies or equivalents, fully compartmentalized browsing, no autom
by manholio 5y ago
> Of course, there is little hope.
I think our hope are technical solutions:
- No 3rd party cookies or equivalents, fully compartmentalized browsing, no automated cross-domain GETs/POSTs, no domain can leak data to another domain without manual intervention
- No User-Agent leak, just a standards compliance level ex. HTML/5.0
- No Java-Script leaks, fonts or any other way to do client fingerprinting
- Cycle your IPv6 addresses or even use persistent IP-domains binding, with OS support, in a Tor-like manner.
- & Many more
It will break the current web yes, but the web needs a do-over, it has become a toxic soup of massive surveillance.
- marcosdumay 5y agoNone of those have any chance of helping.
- manholio 5y agoReally, none of them, not even a chance? And you've conjured that conclusion using your extraordinary powers of argumentation, perchance.
- marcosdumay 5y agoHum. Do you care to explain how any of them could stop the attack on the article? Because they are all aimed at stopping cross domain leaks that have nothing to do with it and fingerprinting that is moot once you share cookies.