4 ms·

Don't worry, we're all on the list already.

• pc86 5y ago
  Kind of makes the concept of lists pointless, doesn't it?
  • panqueque 5y ago
    It does indeed. Dragnet surveillance is dumb and expensive.
  • coolspot 5y ago
    ~150 people commented on this post is manageable number. Narrow it down by sophistication in the topic.
    • notsoanonynous 5y ago
      Maybe I already did this and maybe I didn’t. Maybe it’s all armchair theorizing. Then again… https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wUJccK4lV74 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=wUJccK4lV74 https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SYZqC7EGMfM https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=SYZqC7EGMfM To not share how you secure anonymity is to rely on security by obscurity. Now I think it’s better to lay out the playbook using Kerchkoff’s principle so k will become far larger than 150. Remember… to improve anonymity, at some point you have to publish your private keys. And where better than Hacker News? The playbook is yours. Improve it! Step 1: try to break it. Post how you’d defeat the anonymization scheme. The threat model is that you’re all state level actors combined. I’d love to see what you come up with.
      • panqueque 5y ago
        > I’d love to see what you come up with. Nice try, Feds! :P