That's the glass half-full. If that works for you, then I'm happy that at least one of us has found a solution that works reliably. The glass half-empty is...

That's the glass half-full. If that works for you, then I'm happy that at least one of us has found a solution that works reliably. The glass half-empty is... I'd be much happier if I actually had an information device that I wore on my wrist that gave me all the data I need to manage T1D at a glance without igniting arguably the worst alert fatigue ever seen in healthcare when I have a smartphone, a pump, a CGM, and a watch which all go off in a discordant concert with one another with no clue that the other is alerting or any mechanism for stopping the noise save for turning off the device. In short, my wish is that the companies making these devices would give more care to the _design_ of the ecosystem around them, not just their individual device. I know, this is an emergent problem, but one that I've dealt with nightly at 3 AM when the devices go awry, not my diabetes, which is actually quite stable. The vast majority of my disease control and management issues arise from technology. Like insulin, it's the exogenous nature of the device that indicates there will be side effects, whether we design for them and manage them, or not. Unfortunately, patients pay with their user experience, all day, every day. There is no greater use case for the design of a killer app for the smart watch, i.e. wrist-worn information device, because I don't actually care what time it is. Rather, I'd be happy if the device actually made BG and related information the primary data currency of the device, not time. Time is actually secondary to the primacy of BG in this particular use case. I wear two watches to account for the fact that I need BG at a glance and the sensors for tracking exercise and metabolic impact. I've not seen a single device or interface that gives me what I want on one device at a glance without a byzantine UI.