3 ms·
> Even early champions of the change are going to hate it when their neighbor's houses get torn down so that a casino or something can be built in their place.
by dionidium 5y ago
> Even early champions of the change are going to hate it when their neighbor's houses get torn down so that a casino or something can be built in their place.
Even the strongest critics of the status quo don't think we should eliminate all zoning, so that you'd be able to put a casino on a residential street. What we believe is that you should able to build more residences (and maybe a corner store) on residential streets.
- mywittyname 5y agoFrom what I see from zoning reform advocates, many look at Japan as the solution, precisely because in most of japan, residential houses can go in most any zone. Meaning, an old warehouse could be torn down and replaced with SFH without any change in zoning, but theoretically, a gas station or strip mall can be built right next to those same houses. You can replace an old warehouse in the USA with SFHs. The major difference is the area will have to be rezoned completely before construction starts and the public will get their chance to voice their opinions. This allows everyone to agree on what else may be built on this land before houses go up. Will it be mixed use? Residential only? Are multi-tenant buildings allowed? Then there's the big issue of who controls zoning? Should it be at the state or local level? Both have their positives and negatives.
- seanmcdirmid 5y agoWhat about the new elementary school and sewer lines they are going to need to convert an industrial zone into residential property. It’s not like Japan where we feel comfortable sending our kindergarteners off to the train alone to go to a far off elementary school. Oh, ya, we don’t have a train anyways so it’s even more complicated.