3 ms·

You're missing the point. Anything wanting data integrity will now have to use F_FULLFSYNC, which is slow on this firmware. You might say "you shouldn't care ab

You're missing the point. Anything wanting data integrity will now have to use F_FULLFSYNC, which is slow on this firmware. You might say "you shouldn't care about data integrity to this degree", but databases do, and lots of developers run databases on their machines, and now they'll be real slow. Maybe they'll add some config options like `i_promise_i_dont_care_about_data_integrity = 1`, but come on.

EugeneOZ 5y ago
I’ve mentioned this issue.
- camgunz 5y ago
  What you wrote is: > No, it’s not a problem, it is expected. If you are running a transactional database on your desktop - at least add a UPS to your system. This misses the point--PostgreSQL on my machine is either lossy or slow. A UPS (or battery, in my case) doesn't fix that.
  - EugeneOZ 5y ago
    In the comment you replied to, I wrote: > But still, I hope this topic will be noticed by Apple and they fix that low performance issue for fullsync
    - camgunz 5y ago
      Huh, don't remember that being there but, honestly my memory is crap. Apologies!