5 ms·

I wonder if title should say "in Chromium-based browsers" rather than "in the browser". Especially when it doesn't run in Firefox or Safari.

by fouc 5y ago

canbus 5y ago
It's working OK in Firefox for me on 97.0 (64-bit) in Win10
jeroenhd 5y ago
It runs relatively well in Firefox on Android, though the UI latency is a bit higher than using the Chromium engine. If Firefox fails, you should check your privacy/scripting settings, because it's working fine for me even with privacy-preserving addons installed. Of note is that if you're on iOS, all browsers must use Safari as a rendering engine by Apple's decree, so any browser you try is actually just Safari with a skin (no Gecko/Blink). This means you can't run this on iOS, due to Apple's WASM size restrictions, regardless of the browser you try.
- sharikous 5y ago
  > Apple's WASM size restrictions What are those? I searched for that and I got no relevant results
- amelius 5y ago
  > This means you can't run this on iOS, due to Apple's WASM size restrictions, regardless of the browser you try. What is this? I paid for x GB of RAM and now Apple prevents me from using it? Edit: abstracted away actual memory size.
  - wtetzner 5y ago
    128GB of RAM on iOS?
  - jackson1442 5y ago
    The most expensive iPhone 13 models ship with 6GB of RAM.
vasvir 5y ago
It also works for me in firefox 96 Debian, Linux but it needs some time for downloading... You can't open local files or save to local files. Open/Save remote crashes... Pretty impressive though.
gpvos 5y ago
I haven't tried much yet, but it seems to work fine for me in FF97 on W10 and a modern but not extremely fancy laptop.
jfk13 5y ago
In Firefox 97 on Windows, I repeatedly got "this page is slowing down your browser"; but in Firefox Nightly (99) it's amazingly smooth.
Accacin 5y ago
Running in Firefox 96 on an M1 Mac pretty nicely indeed :) Scrolling feels a little big laggy but entering text and moving things around all feels snappy.

I wonder if title should say "in Chromium-based browsers" rather than "in the browser". Especially when it doesn't run in Firefox or Safari.

by fouc 5y ago

I wonder if title should say "in Chromium-based browsers" rather than "in the browser". Especially when it doesn't run in Firefox or Safari.

canbus 5y ago

It's working OK in Firefox for me on 97.0 (64-bit) in Win10

jeroenhd 5y ago

It runs relatively well in Firefox on Android, though the UI latency is a bit higher than using the Chromium engine. If Firefox fails, you should check your privacy/scripting settings, because it's working fine for me even with privacy-preserving addons installed. Of note is that if you're on iOS, all browsers must use Safari as a rendering engine by Apple's decree, so any browser you try is actually just Safari with a skin (no Gecko/Blink). This means you can't run this on iOS, due to Apple's WASM size restrictions, regardless of the browser you try.

sharikous 5y ago
> Apple's WASM size restrictions What are those? I searched for that and I got no relevant results
amelius 5y ago
> This means you can't run this on iOS, due to Apple's WASM size restrictions, regardless of the browser you try. What is this? I paid for x GB of RAM and now Apple prevents me from using it? Edit: abstracted away actual memory size.
- wtetzner 5y ago
  128GB of RAM on iOS?
- jackson1442 5y ago
  The most expensive iPhone 13 models ship with 6GB of RAM.

vasvir 5y ago

It also works for me in firefox 96 Debian, Linux but it needs some time for downloading... You can't open local files or save to local files. Open/Save remote crashes... Pretty impressive though.

gpvos 5y ago

I haven't tried much yet, but it seems to work fine for me in FF97 on W10 and a modern but not extremely fancy laptop.

jfk13 5y ago

In Firefox 97 on Windows, I repeatedly got "this page is slowing down your browser"; but in Firefox Nightly (99) it's amazingly smooth.

Accacin 5y ago

Running in Firefox 96 on an M1 Mac pretty nicely indeed :) Scrolling feels a little big laggy but entering text and moving things around all feels snappy.