3 ms·

> [...] (bonuses tied directly to increase in Firefox market share). This might be a perverse incentive depending on if your goal is to make Firefox a good bro

• selfhoster11 5y ago
  True, but at this point it doesn't feel to me that the community has that much to lose. If we're truly sub-5% like Statcounter says, then as long as we minimally muzzle this particular paperclip maximiser (say, the browser engine must remain Gecko or an in-house project and cannot be Blink, user privacy must be no worse than currently, selling data or "partnering with" third parties is disallowed) and let it run for a couple of years, at least we'll get a viable browser out of it.
  • marcosdumay 5y ago
    > If we're truly sub-5% like Statcounter says You know, that's the real question we should make before going on this entire exercise. Are the usage statistics any reliable? Firefox is the one browser that blocks the things those sites use to measure market share. Why would we expect their results to be real?
    • selfhoster11 5y ago
      I think they are closer to the truth than not. Despite my constant advocacy for Firefox for over a decade, a family member whom I respect greatly told me directly and in no uncertain terms that they do not wish to use Firefox and wish to switch to Chrome instead because of numerous issues they have observed. And the worst part is that as much as I wanted it to, Firefox wasn't up to it. I cannot help but think that this is a microcosm of what's happening more broadly.