> I take great issue with the word known up above. It's a quote from the abstract. I didn't write it. > Somebody would need to do a deep dive into this data,

> I take great issue with the word known up above. It's a quote from the abstract. I didn't write it. > Somebody would need to do a deep dive into this data, but I'd say that this study is alarmingly starting with a premise that is not proven and may be completely false. This paper introduces no new data. It takes an existing data set, and runs a statistical analysis on it.