4 ms·
As others have noted this is 100% about disastrous management decisions around a software flaw. These decisions, made over and over again, must surely come clo
by brianmcc 5y ago
As others have noted this is 100% about disastrous management decisions around a software flaw.
These decisions, made over and over again, must surely come close to criminal negligence.
This will be a case study in the future, it's just awful how these post masters were treated.
- josefx 5y agoCriminal negligence? Some of the articles linked by other comments indicate that the Post Office ordered all meeting minutes that discussed flaws in the software shredded and in some cases even prohibited note taking to ensure that there were no documents to disclose on the issue. They actively and intentionally went out of their way to destroy peoples lives just so they didn't have to admit fault.
- baobabKoodaa 5y agoVideo recording from a Post Office meeting concerning the flaws: https://youtu.be/pBdGOrcUEg8 https://youtu.be/pBdGOrcUEg8
- brianmcc 5y agoThat's what I mean - surely this is grounds for criminal prosecution? I expect it's almost certainly up for grabs in terms of civil action, but IMO there must be some level of outright illegality here?