3 ms·

What about some middle ground? I’d like my IDE to remain constant between reboots, my browser to some degree is already (if it crashes, it reopens all current t

What about some middle ground? I’d like my IDE to remain constant between reboots, my browser to some degree is already (if it crashes, it reopens all current tabs on start, which is effectively the same). I would have thought some clever hacks on an existing kernel would be reliable enough rather than an entirely new OS just for one feature, though.

webmobdev 5y ago
Isn't that what Hibernation offers on Windows?
- hsbauauvhabzb 5y ago
  Good point. I’ve not even tried to hibernate a Linux machine in 10 years though so I have no idea if it works there
- timka 5y ago
  Sort of like that but you don't have to wait until all your 16Gb of RAM are written to disk. AFAU, Dmitry found a cheap way of making consistent snapshots of a running system. BTW, there was a thread on HN relatively recently where someone mentioned that the hard part of hibernation is not restoring the RAM state but bringing all hardware into the right state at boot. That's why hibernation has been so problematic on Linux.
cdogl 5y ago
That does sound great, but realistically any application needs to be able to recover from a crash anyway - so even with this support from the OS, you just have a new code path to support. Might be nice for users, but it certainly doesn’t simplify anything for developers.
jcelerier 5y ago
The IDE I use, QtCreator, works like this: if you reboot or it crashes you can just restore the previous session on startup and it will bring you exactly where you were.
qwerty456127 5y ago
Why do we need this in a kernel? Why not just serialize the essentials of the apps states and re-load it after reboot/sign-in? I'd prefer the desktop environment to remember which apps were running including which documents were opened in them and their windows positions and just re-launch everything at start-up. Given how fast does everything cold-boot today thanks to modern SSDs, I wouldn't even use standby/hibernate if this worked this way.

webmobdev 5y ago

Isn't that what Hibernation offers on Windows?

hsbauauvhabzb 5y ago
Good point. I’ve not even tried to hibernate a Linux machine in 10 years though so I have no idea if it works there
timka 5y ago
Sort of like that but you don't have to wait until all your 16Gb of RAM are written to disk. AFAU, Dmitry found a cheap way of making consistent snapshots of a running system. BTW, there was a thread on HN relatively recently where someone mentioned that the hard part of hibernation is not restoring the RAM state but bringing all hardware into the right state at boot. That's why hibernation has been so problematic on Linux.

cdogl 5y ago

That does sound great, but realistically any application needs to be able to recover from a crash anyway - so even with this support from the OS, you just have a new code path to support. Might be nice for users, but it certainly doesn’t simplify anything for developers.

jcelerier 5y ago

The IDE I use, QtCreator, works like this: if you reboot or it crashes you can just restore the previous session on startup and it will bring you exactly where you were.

qwerty456127 5y ago

Why do we need this in a kernel? Why not just serialize the essentials of the apps states and re-load it after reboot/sign-in? I'd prefer the desktop environment to remember which apps were running including which documents were opened in them and their windows positions and just re-launch everything at start-up. Given how fast does everything cold-boot today thanks to modern SSDs, I wouldn't even use standby/hibernate if this worked this way.