4 ms·

I just created a new repo with just a master branch. Where does Github force anything? They're sure suggesting it - their suggested commands to initialize a ne

I just created a new repo with just a master branch. Where does Github force anything? They're sure suggesting it - their suggested commands to initialize a new repo will create a main branch. But you can just ignore that suggestion?

Jiejeing 5y ago
edit: my bad, I expected it to be the case but it turns out I had it in my gitconfig instead. They are just going along the git default, so yes, a new repo will be on main branch by default.
- JimDabell 5y ago
  No, the Git default is still master. GitHub changed their default to main.
  - Jiejeing 5y ago
    Right, I was confused by my .gitconfig.
    - JimDabell 5y ago
      No, this is still incorrect. It’s not the future default either. Nobody has made the decision to change the default at present.
      - deleted 5y ago
        [deleted]
zerocrates 5y ago
It's just that, and the "create a first commit/branch/README for me" thing it can do presumably does that with "main" now also.
totony 5y ago
As @zerocrates mentioned, it's about the github auto commit feature when creating a new repo. This makes bootstrapping using terraform more complicated.
JimDabell 5y ago
Perhaps you missed that the person you are replying to was talking about the GitHub API and not their web interface? Here’s the API reference: https://docs.github.com/en/rest/reference/repos#create-an-organization-repository https://docs.github.com/en/rest/reference/repos#create-an-or... I don’t see any parameter for setting the default to master instead of main. However it does seem like you can change it after it has been created with a subsequent update call.
- Grollicus 5y ago
  I'd expect you'd still create an empty repo (same as in the web UI) and then push the branches you want to push. You don't configure a branch name in the web ui as well. But that's why I'm asking where OP found that and not just saying they're wrong. €: There's also https://docs.github.com/en/rest/reference/repos#update-a-repository https://docs.github.com/en/rest/reference/repos#update-a-rep... where you can set the default_branch?

Jiejeing 5y ago

edit: my bad, I expected it to be the case but it turns out I had it in my gitconfig instead. They are just going along the git default, so yes, a new repo will be on main branch by default.

JimDabell 5y ago
No, the Git default is still master. GitHub changed their default to main.
- Jiejeing 5y ago
  Right, I was confused by my .gitconfig.
  - JimDabell 5y ago
    No, this is still incorrect. It’s not the future default either. Nobody has made the decision to change the default at present.
    - deleted 5y ago
      [deleted]

zerocrates 5y ago

It's just that, and the "create a first commit/branch/README for me" thing it can do presumably does that with "main" now also.

totony 5y ago

As @zerocrates mentioned, it's about the github auto commit feature when creating a new repo. This makes bootstrapping using terraform more complicated.

JimDabell 5y ago

Perhaps you missed that the person you are replying to was talking about the GitHub API and not their web interface? Here’s the API reference: https://docs.github.com/en/rest/reference/repos#create-an-organization-repository https://docs.github.com/en/rest/reference/repos#create-an-or... I don’t see any parameter for setting the default to master instead of main. However it does seem like you can change it after it has been created with a subsequent update call.

Grollicus 5y ago
I'd expect you'd still create an empty repo (same as in the web UI) and then push the branches you want to push. You don't configure a branch name in the web ui as well. But that's why I'm asking where OP found that and not just saying they're wrong. €: There's also https://docs.github.com/en/rest/reference/repos#update-a-repository https://docs.github.com/en/rest/reference/repos#update-a-rep... where you can set the default_branch?