3 ms·
>In the US I heard they can literally take your property if they suspect (have no proof) that it might be used in illegal activity. It's called civil asset for
by Clubber 5y ago
>In the US I heard they can literally take your property if they suspect (have no proof) that it might be used in illegal activity.
It's called civil asset forfeiture. Many police departments use this as a tactic to fund their departments. Some have been said to fund police parties and drink machines with it, among other things. The federal government incentivizes this as a "cut" needs to be send to the federal government while the local and state departments need to keep the rest. In 2010, estimated $2.5 billion in assets was seized. They made no distinction between legitimate and illegitimate seizures.
Here's a recent example of an innocent man (and former marine) getting around $80k seised and left with $10. The corruption is at all levels.
https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/stephen-lara-nevada-asset-forfeiture-adoption/2021/09/01/6f170932-06ae-11ec-8c3f-3526f81b233b_story.html https://www.washingtonpost.com/national-security/stephen-lar...
Also, in the US, all civil servants have what's called qualified immunity, which means they can't be sued for wrongdoing unless the exact thing happened before qualified immunity was enacted in the 60s. This is an example of a corrupt government protecting itself.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_immunity https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Qualified_immunity
- YEwSdObPQT 5y agoThanks for the information. I've seen Civil Asset Forfeiture discussed about before on message boards and couldn't remember for the life of what it was called. Civil Asset Forfeiture is just state sanctioned theft from what I can tell. > Also, in the US, all civil servants have what's called qualified immunity, which means they can't be sued for wrongdoing unless the exact thing happened before qualified immunity was enacted in the 60s. This is an example of a corrupt government protecting itself. I didn't know about this. But yep it is another example of the state protecting itself at the detriment of the citizenry.