> there is a coordinated effort to not care about X by web3 which is false by definition. > the apparent centralization of web3 being supposed to be p2p, there

> there is a coordinated effort to not care about X by web3 which is false by definition. > the apparent centralization of web3 being supposed to be p2p, there are several different web3 providers (eth, poly, ipfs) with different incentives. > a pessimistic example of what's possible with web3 tech. I want to engage on these points in good faith. I'm asking you to expand these because I'm curious. I think crypto economics are a blight in practice, while the theory might be sound. You've presented a head and no body work, and I am genuinely curious to hear the expansion.