3 ms·
It's unethical to publish content that promotes white supremacists, even indirectly. Don't see how it's unethical to censor it though
by smus 5y ago
It's unethical to publish content that promotes white supremacists, even indirectly. Don't see how it's unethical to censor it though
- tastyfreeze 5y agoRogan has never promoted white supremacists. That is slander by the media.
- Supermancho 5y ago> It's unethical to publish content that promotes white supremacists I dont understand how you can come to that conclusion. eg A doctor saving the life of a white supremacist. Ethics are differentiated by profession. It is not altigether clear, which ethical considerations Spotify is bound by and apply to this situation.
- smus 5y agoYou think a doctor saving the life of a white supremacist is the same as publishing content that promotes white supremacy? Huh, I guess that's certainly one way to understand the world
- Supermancho 5y ago> You think a doctor saving the life of a white supremacist is the same as publishing content that promotes white supremacy? I do not. That assertion is unrelated to the topic, so Im not sure why you imagined it. To be clear, I have implied the consequences are equal or, worse, probably multiplicative...in the context of the theoretical consideration you posited. > It's unethical to publish content that promotes white supremacists Again, how does this relate to any ethics that applies to Spotify?
- smus 5y agoYou are a poor communicator. When did you first ask how my quote relates to Spotify? Why did you post an unrelated hypothetical under my comment?