4 ms·

I have seen zero hate speech, but I mostly use FB to share pictures of my kids.

ergocoder 5y ago
It is because this person is surrounded by toxic people. My feed is updates from friends. I don't really hate speech or anything toxic.
beermonster 5y ago
Why use FB for that and not a picture sharing site, just out of interest?
- missedthecue 5y ago
  The people he'd like to show the pictures to are all conveniently aggregated on FB, but not on the picture sharing site.
  - CodeGlitch 5y ago
    Or use a service like Dropbox or OneDrive where you can share folders to select people (they don't need to be signed up- you just send them a link). Of course this means you need their email or phone number... But using either of those is way better than a service like Facebook.
    - The_Colonel 5y ago
      You lose the ability to comment/like photos. Also, it will get messy with a collection of links. For small audiences I like google photos the best. If you want to share something with more people (all your friends) then facebook is probably the best option.
      - CodeGlitch 5y ago
        > You lose the ability to comment/like photos. They can reply with any comments to the email / txt can they not? I'm thinking of the scenario of sending photos to close friends / family. For larger audiences, I'd use my own platform running something like WordPress. As for "likes" - I guess I'm of a generation where they are irrelevant to me :) > For small audiences I like google photos the best. Will check that out. cheers.
        The_Colonel 5y ago
        > They can reply with any comments to the email / txt can they not? Not to the individual photos, unless you go with "You look funny in that photo named DSC0124.JPG". Not to mention that people often have trouble with "reply to all" function. In practice, I can't see people commenting photo album with email.
    - missedthecue 5y ago
      Facebook is passive. It's a little weird to email pictures of your kids to your entire contact list every couples days.
      - beermonster 5y ago
        You can passively share albums on a number of platforms. Why would you email them actively? As you say, that’s a bit weird.
        missedthecue 5y ago
        No one checks their Dropbox 4x a day. People check Facebook 4x a day.
pwdisswordfish9 5y ago
Shame on you then for violating their privacy.
- garbagetime 5y ago
  This seems more of a cultural thing than an obviously morally terrible act.
  - vaylian 5y ago
    For tech people (like the ones who post here), it should be fairly obvious.

It is because this person is surrounded by toxic people. My feed is updates from friends. I don't really hate speech or anything toxic.

beermonster 5y ago

Why use FB for that and not a picture sharing site, just out of interest?

missedthecue 5y ago
The people he'd like to show the pictures to are all conveniently aggregated on FB, but not on the picture sharing site.
- CodeGlitch 5y ago
  Or use a service like Dropbox or OneDrive where you can share folders to select people (they don't need to be signed up- you just send them a link). Of course this means you need their email or phone number... But using either of those is way better than a service like Facebook.
  - The_Colonel 5y ago
    You lose the ability to comment/like photos. Also, it will get messy with a collection of links. For small audiences I like google photos the best. If you want to share something with more people (all your friends) then facebook is probably the best option.
    - CodeGlitch 5y ago
      > You lose the ability to comment/like photos. They can reply with any comments to the email / txt can they not? I'm thinking of the scenario of sending photos to close friends / family. For larger audiences, I'd use my own platform running something like WordPress. As for "likes" - I guess I'm of a generation where they are irrelevant to me :) > For small audiences I like google photos the best. Will check that out. cheers.
      - The_Colonel 5y ago
        > They can reply with any comments to the email / txt can they not? Not to the individual photos, unless you go with "You look funny in that photo named DSC0124.JPG". Not to mention that people often have trouble with "reply to all" function. In practice, I can't see people commenting photo album with email.
  - missedthecue 5y ago
    Facebook is passive. It's a little weird to email pictures of your kids to your entire contact list every couples days.
    - beermonster 5y ago
      You can passively share albums on a number of platforms. Why would you email them actively? As you say, that’s a bit weird.
      - missedthecue 5y ago
        No one checks their Dropbox 4x a day. People check Facebook 4x a day.

pwdisswordfish9 5y ago

Shame on you then for violating their privacy.

garbagetime 5y ago
This seems more of a cultural thing than an obviously morally terrible act.
- vaylian 5y ago
  For tech people (like the ones who post here), it should be fairly obvious.