4 ms·

You mean of course it is simpler and cheaper for the provider, not for "people" (the users). For actual users nothing beats the simplicity of paying via contac

by haspok 5y ago

You mean of course it is simpler and cheaper for the provider, not for "people" (the users). For actual users nothing beats the simplicity of paying via contactless card (or mobile) payment solution. Right now I have probably over a dozen apps installed just for paying for various services like parking (of course, each city/country has its own), it is _madness_, and I'm not even using anything special. I hate this passionately and would actually pay for simplicity!

fastball 5y ago
I disagree. It's easier for me to have my payment method attached to an account and that account to be automatically debited whenever I connect my car.
pm90 5y ago
It’s sorta also creates a situation where you need to have a smartphone with a decent specs to access basic services like parking and fuel. Whereas earlier it was any legal tender. I wonder if a lawsuit could be brought against companies that restrict how they accept payment for services. It would seem like something like cashless stores would be illegal if cash is legal tender.
- seanmcdirmid 5y ago
  The constitution only specified that cash can be used to settle debts or pay taxes. Stores can (and many do) refuse cash.
- KptMarchewa 5y ago
  You also need to read and write to access basic services. I wonder where we could just provide all stubborn people with basic government endorsed smartphone just to shut up this argument.
  - pm90 5y ago
    The Government does provide free public education to cover the read/write parts. And yes, absolutely a subsidy for folks to get a decent smartphone would be just fine.
- tsimionescu 5y ago
  No business is required to do business with you. Now, if you incur a debt and then they refuse to accept your money, that could potentially be a problem, but otherwise it's perfectly ok for them to refuse your cash at the register and tell you to leave without the products you wanted to purchase.
lapetitejort 5y ago
I have two apps for EV charging, one app for finding charging stations, two apps for parking, one app to connect to the car, and another app to connect to an OBDII bluetooth dongle. My PTSD flairs up (slight exaggeration) whenever I see a new company offering chargers or parking.
_ph_ 5y ago
Higher costs for the provider translate into higher costs for the customers.
- ohgodplsno 5y ago
  Lower costs for the provider do not necessarily translate into lower costs for the customers, most likely higher profits for the provider.
- haspok 5y ago
  Which is fine by me. Look, I'm not saying there shouldn't be an app at all, all I'm saying is that people should not be forced to use the app.
- HWR_14 5y ago
  Sometimes. Sometimes it comes out of corporate profits.
seanmcdirmid 5y ago
If it’s cheaper for them, why isn’t it cheaper for us? > For actual users nothing beats the simplicity of paying via contactless card (or mobile) payment solution. Not true. The next level of simplicity is not having to do anything at all (eg just plug in to charge and have the money deducted automatically). NFC or fiddling with an app on a phone is definitely worse than that. But now we need more standards to enable it for anyone other than teslas.
KptMarchewa 5y ago
It's also easier for me to pay for parking on app rather than - look 5 minutes for parking meter - type car plate number on an antiquated unergonomic keyboard that doesn't work really well in winter - go back to car and put the paper behind windshield, which accidentally is opposite the direction I want to go - few hours later realize that I want to stay longer than I've bought parking for, and go back to prolongate it >Right now I have probably over a dozen apps installed just for paying for various services like parking (of course, each city/country has its own), it is _madness_, and I'm not even using anything special. Here in Poland I can do this in my banking app for pretty much every parking in my country. Blame your shitty parking providers rather than technology.

by haspok 5y ago

fastball 5y ago

I disagree. It's easier for me to have my payment method attached to an account and that account to be automatically debited whenever I connect my car.

pm90 5y ago

It’s sorta also creates a situation where you need to have a smartphone with a decent specs to access basic services like parking and fuel. Whereas earlier it was any legal tender. I wonder if a lawsuit could be brought against companies that restrict how they accept payment for services. It would seem like something like cashless stores would be illegal if cash is legal tender.

seanmcdirmid 5y ago
The constitution only specified that cash can be used to settle debts or pay taxes. Stores can (and many do) refuse cash.
KptMarchewa 5y ago
You also need to read and write to access basic services. I wonder where we could just provide all stubborn people with basic government endorsed smartphone just to shut up this argument.
- pm90 5y ago
  The Government does provide free public education to cover the read/write parts. And yes, absolutely a subsidy for folks to get a decent smartphone would be just fine.
tsimionescu 5y ago
No business is required to do business with you. Now, if you incur a debt and then they refuse to accept your money, that could potentially be a problem, but otherwise it's perfectly ok for them to refuse your cash at the register and tell you to leave without the products you wanted to purchase.

lapetitejort 5y ago

I have two apps for EV charging, one app for finding charging stations, two apps for parking, one app to connect to the car, and another app to connect to an OBDII bluetooth dongle. My PTSD flairs up (slight exaggeration) whenever I see a new company offering chargers or parking.

_ph_ 5y ago

Higher costs for the provider translate into higher costs for the customers.

ohgodplsno 5y ago
Lower costs for the provider do not necessarily translate into lower costs for the customers, most likely higher profits for the provider.
haspok 5y ago
Which is fine by me. Look, I'm not saying there shouldn't be an app at all, all I'm saying is that people should not be forced to use the app.
HWR_14 5y ago
Sometimes. Sometimes it comes out of corporate profits.

seanmcdirmid 5y ago

If it’s cheaper for them, why isn’t it cheaper for us? > For actual users nothing beats the simplicity of paying via contactless card (or mobile) payment solution. Not true. The next level of simplicity is not having to do anything at all (eg just plug in to charge and have the money deducted automatically). NFC or fiddling with an app on a phone is definitely worse than that. But now we need more standards to enable it for anyone other than teslas.

KptMarchewa 5y ago

It's also easier for me to pay for parking on app rather than - look 5 minutes for parking meter - type car plate number on an antiquated unergonomic keyboard that doesn't work really well in winter - go back to car and put the paper behind windshield, which accidentally is opposite the direction I want to go - few hours later realize that I want to stay longer than I've bought parking for, and go back to prolongate it >Right now I have probably over a dozen apps installed just for paying for various services like parking (of course, each city/country has its own), it is _madness_, and I'm not even using anything special. Here in Poland I can do this in my banking app for pretty much every parking in my country. Blame your shitty parking providers rather than technology.