7 ms·

How to find a job for hackers

116 points by Peroni 15y ago

Hyena 15y ago
So how does this fit in with the other articles on HN which insist that there are far more openings than people?
- Peroni 15y ago
  That's a point I agree with but it doesn't change the fact that there are a huge number of people on HN who are struggling to find the right kind of work, if any work at all. After I submitted some of my previous blog posts I was inundated with emails from HNer's asking for CV advice and general advice on how to find work so I decided to address the problem. Ultimately, if this post so much as helps one person then it will have been worth it.
- wccrawford 15y ago
  Not all job markets are the same. Your skills may be less in demand where you live, and more in demand elsewhere. Likewise, companies may be trying to hire people with skills that are rare in their area.
  - randomdata 15y ago
    In the field of software development, location doesn't matter. Especially when some of the most vocal companies are in the business of bringing people at a distance together. If they cannot manage remote workers, what does that say about their products?
    - wccrawford 15y ago
      Plenty of companies still refuse to hire remote workers, and often I can't blame them.
    - xentronium 15y ago
      > In the field of software development, location doesn't matter. Wishful thinking.
      - randomdata 15y ago
        Anecdotal experience. I've been working "big city" development jobs from the farm for nearly a decade. I have never had difficulty finding people who wanted to work with me.
bhoung 15y ago
Disappointed. Was hoping that this was how to find a 'job for hackers', not 'how to find a job' for hackers.
- Peroni 15y ago
  Technically it's both. The advice I give in regards to where to look and how to go about improving your chances is exactly that. People who post vacancies on HN & GitHub are looking for hackers, not code-monkeys.
  - rawsyntax 15y ago
    honestly this looks like a little advice on how to format your resumé / look for a job online. I saw nothing about acing the interview or how to write a really killer cover letter. I wrote a post about how to get a programming interview a few months back, I feel it provides more detail than your article http://rawsyntax.com/post/6249655944/how-to-get-a-programming-interview http://rawsyntax.com/post/6249655944/how-to-get-a-programmin...
    - Peroni 15y ago
      The title is 'How to find a job' not 'How to secure a job'. Finding the opportunity is the hardest part and cover letters aren't as relevant as what you may think. I'm sure your post is great for interview advice, mine was aimed at helping people get those interviews in the first place.
      - achompas 15y ago
        and cover letters aren't as relevant as what you may think My experience tells me that cover letter relevancy is subjective. Some managers swear they need to read a good one, and others flip right to the resume.
      - jim_h 15y ago
        My experience is that the cover letter was beneficial to getting an interview. In the cover letter I am able to demonstrate that I know about their company and that my skills/experience are a good fit for their position. I know this was useful from my experience since the interviewers have mentioned that cover letter was very useful or they brought up details from it.
sixtofour 15y ago
"The advice I would give you however is to send your CV as a Word or PDF document and include a link to your LaTeX version." I understand why a recruiter would want an editable resume (Word), to strip off the candidate's PII and add the recruiter's branding. I don't understand why a hiring company, receiving a resume sent directly from candidate to company, would need an editable resume.
- Peroni 15y ago
  A lot of organisations have a system/process for dealing with job applicants and most (at least in London) need an editable copy. Plus, as I mentioned in the post, not everyone is familiar with LaTeX so it can be a bit hit or miss.
  - zeugma 15y ago
    The goal of LaTeX is to output a printable document, most of the time a pdf. I don't think sending the sources is polite nor very readable nevermind HR-compliant.
    - Peroni 15y ago
      Fair point. What do you do with a situation where the person receiving the LaTeX CV has never heard of LaTeX though?
      - zeugma 15y ago
        I always sent a PDF file. You can only see that is was made by LaTeX with a trained eye(if their is not too heavy customization) or in the PDF meta-data. Designers would use pre-print tool like inDesign, which output PDF too. PDF document is a problem with big companies portal that only want word document. I tried a few doc converter but they are not Free (as in beer and Freedom) and the result is of course really inferior. Nowadays, I would try html conversion as I think the result can be quite good and readable by most people (even without pdf reader). Also, always have a hard copy of your CV for the interview. Once, the corporate website of a company I applied accepted pdf files, but butchered them via pdf2txt or something like that. Having the right layout to show them saved the day.
deleted 15y ago
[deleted]
swalkergibson 15y ago
Network, network, network! Get out and shake hands. People make most of their decisions based on emotions, you want to interview for the position before you even get to the interview. Also, I find that a good strategy when looking for a new job is to say that you are currently working on something else but are always on the look out for new challenges and to keep in touch if they have something come up.
tejaswiy 15y ago
I'm going through this process myself and I think one thing that'd be great is if you can A/B test your resume. What do you think about the general idea for a website that lets you do a hot or not style A/B test for resumes? Basically, limit it to programmers, Upvote / Downvote the resume and a comment section.
- Peroni 15y ago
  I'm sure it would work and the people here on HN would be all over it. The only tricky part would be to come up with a system that obfuscates the personal details as well as the company details or you may run into privacy issues.
- HSO 15y ago
  Sounds like a good idea. One crucial difference to the original, though, is that you're _supposed_ to react instantaneously to a picture. Resumes, even 1-pagers, demand more care or some involvement of higher cognitive functions. So, this could get very tired soon. I myself would be _much_ more interested in what other people think than in looking at other people's resumes; at best, I might be able to look at 5 max. People watching is (kind of) fun, people pay premiums to have their coffees in cafes, after all. But it's not exactly my idea of fun to look at a bunch of random CVs.
  - rquantz 15y ago
    Make people work for it then: in order to get feedback you need to review 5 other people's resumes.
- mike-cardwell 15y ago
  I don't think A/B testing is suitable for this. You could never collect enough data to make any statistically significant observations.
- patio11 15y ago
  If I needed a resume, I would A/B test it, but this would be theatre. You'd need huge amounts of views and a decently high conversion rate to pull it off. Neither of these suggests a happy hiring process. The main reason to A/B test the resume is to be the kind of guy who A/B tests his resume, which I guarantee you will push the right kinds of buttons at some companies.
gmodena 15y ago
As a reference on the topic, I found Andy Lester's "Land the Tech Job You Love" (PragProg) an informative and entertaining reading. It contains a few useful tips & hacks on how to tailor your CV and "hunt" jobs that match your expectations (backed by real life stories and examples). Some of the treated aspects - imo - fall under common sense, but I would suggest anyone with little (or none) experience on the job market to pick it up nonetheless.
wheels 15y ago
This is all good advice. But there are two even more important things that I'd add: • Specialize. It's way easier for an in-demand specialist to find work and also it's much easier to answer who you'd like to work for once you've got a narrower focus. • If you're applying for a job that's posted internet, you're already behind the curve. Build a network. Make sure that you know other programmers and that they know you're looking for a job. If you know specific companies you want to work for, make an effort to meet people at those companies. The two points interact because if you specialize, you tend to get to know the other specialists in your field. I've done a lot of audio software in C++ and did that in my last job. Even before working there I knew a bunch of the other people that did C++ audio software and one of them did an intro for me that got me the job. This wasn't even theoretical -- I actually had filled out the online job form a few weeks prior and gotten the, "This position has already been filled." mail. When I used a personal intro instead I had an interview inside of a week and they wanted to know how quickly I could start.
- Peroni 15y ago
  There is literally nothing more powerful than having someone within the business introducing you. Your points about specialising are 100% valid and it is very good advice however I would add that people need to think carefully about what they want to specialise in as if you make the wrong choice you are stuck with a career you hate and will struggling to move out of that speciality.
  - mechanical_fish 15y ago
    It occurs to me that this may be precisely the reason why specialists command higher rates and find it easier to sell their services: Specialization is a risk. Sometimes it's a big risk. The reason why you pay extra for a specialist in $FIELD_X is that you're compensating that expert for having taken the risk of specializing in $FIELD_X. There were NeXTSTEP programming experts in 1998. Those people sure ended up hitting the jackpot, though nobody could have predicted it at the time. I assure you that there were also AOLServer Tcl programming experts in 1998. Nobody remembers them. :] (At least, not for that.) This line of thinking makes me wonder if the standard "be a specialist" advice is yet another example of sample bias: Because the lucky and successful specialists make money, stay in business, and eventually retire and spend their time writing articles and talks about how great it is to be a specialist, we may think specialization is a better idea than it actually is. Make sure to balance your approach by talking to some of the poor folks who specialized in Pascal programming, or Palm WebOS. Or ask an expert Flash programmer how they feel about the rise of the iPad. Keep your escape routes handy!
larrik 15y ago
"Do not limit your CV to one page. If your experience spans more than 3 years or more than 3 jobs then you need details and it's madness to limit yourself to one page in this situation." My interpretation was always that the "one page resume" rule was aimed at new college grads, since they may be more likely to ramble on (and their experience barely matters anyway). The problem is that they don't realize after they get a real job that they shouldn't (necessarily) follow this rule anymore.
- Peroni 15y ago
  The problem is that they don't realize after they get a real job that they shouldn't (necessarily) follow this rule anymore. Absolutely spot on. A grad will struggle to fill two pages but once you have some bit of experience you really should disregard that rule.
  - mseebach 15y ago
    I assume you should aim to keep it succinct, though? I've interviewed a guy who literally listed the names of the methods on an API he'd developed. I think he clocked in a 6-7 pages for a three year career. Surprising as he came through a recruiter, I'd assume a recruiter would provide some CV critique.
    - Peroni 15y ago
      Chances are the recruiter hadn't a clue what he was looking at. He would have been too afraid to edit it as he had no idea where to start. That sort of info is fine on your personal site which you can link to from your CV but to include it all on your formal CV is madness. Personally I think 3 pages, 4 max if you are a contractor is more than enough.
iCococabana 15y ago
Nothing about this posts addresses the fact that, unlike other authors, companies will steal your work and claim your IP, in exchange for a pathetic salary. That means no royalties on million-dollar applications. Suckers!
illumen 15y ago
Prove you the have skills. That's the shortest piece of advice I could think of on the matter that works.
- alexshye 15y ago
  Agreed. To add on to that, I'd say have skills, have a good network that knows it, and don't be an asshole.
deleted 15y ago
[deleted]
snorkel 15y ago
I've had to hire many hackers myself so I'll cut to the chase for you: * RESUME ACCEPTANCE IS BASED ON KEYWORDS: If your resume does not inlcude the SAME KEYWORDS MENTIONED IN THE JOB POSTING then it gets tossed aside. if (posting.keywords() != resume.keywords()) { resume.destroy(); continue; } Are hiring managers really this stupid and shallow?! YES!!! All of them!!! HR reps are even twice as shallow because HR doesn't know the meaning of the keywords! * If the job posting says "Scrum" and your resume says "Agile" then you edit your resume and change that word to say "Scrum". * If the job posting says "Django" and your resume says "many popular Python frameworks" then you edit your resume to say "Django" * If job posting says "Ruby" and you put "Rails" ... guess what you should do about it? * Skip the cover letter. This is not an essay contest. Nobody reads this. * Top of resume: BRIEF two sentence description of your typical role on a technical team and the type of role are seeking. * Next item of resume: Bullet point list of skills and experience. Keyword A, Keyword B, Keyword C ... remarkably similar to the job posting. What a coincidence! * Remainder of resume: Employment history. Short descriptions. Everything you ever worked on is boring so don't get into details. Don't exceed 3 pages. ACTUAL RESUME HACKS: * Fill employment gaps decreasing the time scale. Instead of Month/Year next to each job, just put the year. Nobody cares if you weren't working between April and August so don't draw attention to it. * If your GPA sucks then don't mention it. Nobody cares about your GPA unless you have no work history to speak of. * Don't mention unrelated jobs in your work history. If your spent a year as a galley cook on oil rig then mention that under hobbies, not work history. It makes you seem like a transient to have a lot of odd unrelated jobs that don't follow the theme of this job posting. * Non-paying jobs are still jobs. If you worked on your uncle's business web site for free while looking for a job, and you had to build the web site, then put it in your work history if you need it to fill the gap. Technical work is still work. If later on someone verifies your work history tell them it was an unpaid volunteer. Nobody cares. * Isn't omitting the truth lying? If this is how you feel then don't bother applying for marketing jobs. Ask a marketing person to tweak your resume for you. Explain to them you are a technical person who only has a binary understanding of truth. * Send your resume as a PDF attachment. Everyone can open a PDF. Not everyone has the latest greatest version of Word. If your skill set matches, and you can prove your skills, then don't put things on your resume that will kill the deal. The resume makes the introduction, it is your calling card, it is your marketing. List the skills you have that they want. Your resume not your complete autobiography or a place to confess your gaps and incompetencies.
wesleyb 15y ago
This is how I found my first job (straight out of college, industry had crashed in south africa after the .99 bomb, I had been looking for a while but no luck). This is what I eventually came up with, you decide if it's how hackers find a job. - I put an ad in a popular job seeker's rag. It cost a pretty penny, but the end result was worth it. - The ad was not as a job seeker, but as an employer - The employer, of course, was fake but I described the kind of company that I wanted to work at - I then listed credentials and traits similar to mine, for this was the person my false company was looking for (in the end looking for someone like me upped my chances of success) - I put an email and a fax number, where they could send resume's. I insisted on references being passed through. - Naturally, my fax ran out of paper, me email box was flooded. - I screened the resume's of the candidates, paying particular attention to their previous employers, eventually picking the one I wanted to work for - I then phoned the few candidates selected and asked them about their previous job (all the while still pretending to be a potential employer -- it sucks, but I was running out of hope and really wanted a good job!) - I finally picked the one that loved his previous job but decided to leave because he had done everything to be done there - I phoned the reference provided in his resume` "Hi, this is Wesley. I met so-and-so at a party on the weekend, he mentioned you may be looking for devs that are x, y and z" Enter my first job.
- Peroni 15y ago
  Innovative but unethical and highly illegal in the UK.
davesims 15y ago
I disagree with OP's advice about the job boards. Yes, you will be inundated by cattle-call outsourced call centers. Yes, 90% of them will be: URGENT NEED 6 MO CONTRACT 8+ yr experienced J2EE 35.52/HR. Totally annoying. My advice: get over it. You want a job, right? Why limit yourself? Where's the harm? Learning to sniff out the bad recruiters from good is a pretty essential skill in this business. I have really good relationships with a handful of recruiters I met this way that are experienced, professional, genuinely interested in my career and not interested in mismatching. Yeah, I had to get burned a couple of times, and yes I've had to learn to filter out the cattle call, code monkey staff aug stuff. And it's great. Once you learn to filter and know the good recruiters from bad (tone of voice in the first 30 seconds usually gives it away) you'll find that in the 10% non-crap calls are usually lurking some good opportunities. Flip this around to the recruiter's perspective. 99% of their candidates and contacts are crap as well. If you actually know what you're doing and have a decent resume, there's a significant percentage of these recruiters who will be thrilled to find you and may actually have some interesting work, if not now, down the line. This has happened for me on a number of occasions. If you want to avoid annoyances, by all means avoid the job boards. But if you're on the market, don't limit your options by snobbery or fear of annoyance. Learn to filter your calls and sift through the dross -- there may be a great opportunity in there if you're patient.
- Peroni 15y ago
  All completely valid advice however most find job boards a chore so my advice is designed to be a preemptive measure to save people from the standard route of job boards.
cHalgan 15y ago
I think the main problem is that in brave new world of "connection is everything" landing job is really really hard if you just sending resume thru HR/normal process. If nothing you should always edit resume based on the job posting (so you can match lingo used in the posting) - but chances that the resume will land on managers desk is near zero (it like sending unsolicited business plan to VCs...) The most efficient way to land the job it to establish direct contact with hiring manager (or somebody in the team). I.e., pay $50 for linkedin so you can send email directly saying exactly what you want ...
skrebbel 15y ago
It's a good thing that Silicon Valley = The World, because otherwise half this post wouldn't have made any sense. HN's "Who's hiring" thread, yeah that works. And I think the amount of hiring managers in the Netherlands who know Github is below 10. Sure, some years may fix this, but right now, the advice in this blog is painfully regionally specific.
- Peroni 15y ago
  Funnily enough I'm based in London and a lot of the advice is UK-centric. Granted Github has limited exposure outside of the US & the UK but I am not versed on Dutch standards so I'm afraid I would struggle to offer advice!
known 15y ago
Writing software (hacker) != Selling software (MBA) != Selling consulting (Bodyshopping)

116 points by Peroni 15y ago

Hyena 15y ago

So how does this fit in with the other articles on HN which insist that there are far more openings than people?

Peroni 15y ago
That's a point I agree with but it doesn't change the fact that there are a huge number of people on HN who are struggling to find the right kind of work, if any work at all. After I submitted some of my previous blog posts I was inundated with emails from HNer's asking for CV advice and general advice on how to find work so I decided to address the problem. Ultimately, if this post so much as helps one person then it will have been worth it.
wccrawford 15y ago
Not all job markets are the same. Your skills may be less in demand where you live, and more in demand elsewhere. Likewise, companies may be trying to hire people with skills that are rare in their area.
- randomdata 15y ago
  In the field of software development, location doesn't matter. Especially when some of the most vocal companies are in the business of bringing people at a distance together. If they cannot manage remote workers, what does that say about their products?
  - wccrawford 15y ago
    Plenty of companies still refuse to hire remote workers, and often I can't blame them.
  - xentronium 15y ago
    > In the field of software development, location doesn't matter. Wishful thinking.
    - randomdata 15y ago
      Anecdotal experience. I've been working "big city" development jobs from the farm for nearly a decade. I have never had difficulty finding people who wanted to work with me.

bhoung 15y ago

Disappointed. Was hoping that this was how to find a 'job for hackers', not 'how to find a job' for hackers.

Peroni 15y ago
Technically it's both. The advice I give in regards to where to look and how to go about improving your chances is exactly that. People who post vacancies on HN & GitHub are looking for hackers, not code-monkeys.
- rawsyntax 15y ago
  honestly this looks like a little advice on how to format your resumé / look for a job online. I saw nothing about acing the interview or how to write a really killer cover letter. I wrote a post about how to get a programming interview a few months back, I feel it provides more detail than your article http://rawsyntax.com/post/6249655944/how-to-get-a-programming-interview http://rawsyntax.com/post/6249655944/how-to-get-a-programmin...
  - Peroni 15y ago
    The title is 'How to find a job' not 'How to secure a job'. Finding the opportunity is the hardest part and cover letters aren't as relevant as what you may think. I'm sure your post is great for interview advice, mine was aimed at helping people get those interviews in the first place.
    - achompas 15y ago
      and cover letters aren't as relevant as what you may think My experience tells me that cover letter relevancy is subjective. Some managers swear they need to read a good one, and others flip right to the resume.
    - jim_h 15y ago
      My experience is that the cover letter was beneficial to getting an interview. In the cover letter I am able to demonstrate that I know about their company and that my skills/experience are a good fit for their position. I know this was useful from my experience since the interviewers have mentioned that cover letter was very useful or they brought up details from it.

sixtofour 15y ago

"The advice I would give you however is to send your CV as a Word or PDF document and include a link to your LaTeX version." I understand why a recruiter would want an editable resume (Word), to strip off the candidate's PII and add the recruiter's branding. I don't understand why a hiring company, receiving a resume sent directly from candidate to company, would need an editable resume.

Peroni 15y ago
A lot of organisations have a system/process for dealing with job applicants and most (at least in London) need an editable copy. Plus, as I mentioned in the post, not everyone is familiar with LaTeX so it can be a bit hit or miss.
- zeugma 15y ago
  The goal of LaTeX is to output a printable document, most of the time a pdf. I don't think sending the sources is polite nor very readable nevermind HR-compliant.
  - Peroni 15y ago
    Fair point. What do you do with a situation where the person receiving the LaTeX CV has never heard of LaTeX though?
    - zeugma 15y ago
      I always sent a PDF file. You can only see that is was made by LaTeX with a trained eye(if their is not too heavy customization) or in the PDF meta-data. Designers would use pre-print tool like inDesign, which output PDF too. PDF document is a problem with big companies portal that only want word document. I tried a few doc converter but they are not Free (as in beer and Freedom) and the result is of course really inferior. Nowadays, I would try html conversion as I think the result can be quite good and readable by most people (even without pdf reader). Also, always have a hard copy of your CV for the interview. Once, the corporate website of a company I applied accepted pdf files, but butchered them via pdf2txt or something like that. Having the right layout to show them saved the day.

deleted 15y ago

[deleted]

swalkergibson 15y ago

Network, network, network! Get out and shake hands. People make most of their decisions based on emotions, you want to interview for the position before you even get to the interview. Also, I find that a good strategy when looking for a new job is to say that you are currently working on something else but are always on the look out for new challenges and to keep in touch if they have something come up.

tejaswiy 15y ago

I'm going through this process myself and I think one thing that'd be great is if you can A/B test your resume. What do you think about the general idea for a website that lets you do a hot or not style A/B test for resumes? Basically, limit it to programmers, Upvote / Downvote the resume and a comment section.

Peroni 15y ago
I'm sure it would work and the people here on HN would be all over it. The only tricky part would be to come up with a system that obfuscates the personal details as well as the company details or you may run into privacy issues.
HSO 15y ago
Sounds like a good idea. One crucial difference to the original, though, is that you're _supposed_ to react instantaneously to a picture. Resumes, even 1-pagers, demand more care or some involvement of higher cognitive functions. So, this could get very tired soon. I myself would be _much_ more interested in what other people think than in looking at other people's resumes; at best, I might be able to look at 5 max. People watching is (kind of) fun, people pay premiums to have their coffees in cafes, after all. But it's not exactly my idea of fun to look at a bunch of random CVs.
- rquantz 15y ago
  Make people work for it then: in order to get feedback you need to review 5 other people's resumes.
mike-cardwell 15y ago
I don't think A/B testing is suitable for this. You could never collect enough data to make any statistically significant observations.
patio11 15y ago
If I needed a resume, I would A/B test it, but this would be theatre. You'd need huge amounts of views and a decently high conversion rate to pull it off. Neither of these suggests a happy hiring process. The main reason to A/B test the resume is to be the kind of guy who A/B tests his resume, which I guarantee you will push the right kinds of buttons at some companies.

gmodena 15y ago

As a reference on the topic, I found Andy Lester's "Land the Tech Job You Love" (PragProg) an informative and entertaining reading. It contains a few useful tips & hacks on how to tailor your CV and "hunt" jobs that match your expectations (backed by real life stories and examples). Some of the treated aspects - imo - fall under common sense, but I would suggest anyone with little (or none) experience on the job market to pick it up nonetheless.

wheels 15y ago

This is all good advice. But there are two even more important things that I'd add: • Specialize. It's way easier for an in-demand specialist to find work and also it's much easier to answer who you'd like to work for once you've got a narrower focus. • If you're applying for a job that's posted internet, you're already behind the curve. Build a network. Make sure that you know other programmers and that they know you're looking for a job. If you know specific companies you want to work for, make an effort to meet people at those companies. The two points interact because if you specialize, you tend to get to know the other specialists in your field. I've done a lot of audio software in C++ and did that in my last job. Even before working there I knew a bunch of the other people that did C++ audio software and one of them did an intro for me that got me the job. This wasn't even theoretical -- I actually had filled out the online job form a few weeks prior and gotten the, "This position has already been filled." mail. When I used a personal intro instead I had an interview inside of a week and they wanted to know how quickly I could start.

Peroni 15y ago
There is literally nothing more powerful than having someone within the business introducing you. Your points about specialising are 100% valid and it is very good advice however I would add that people need to think carefully about what they want to specialise in as if you make the wrong choice you are stuck with a career you hate and will struggling to move out of that speciality.
- mechanical_fish 15y ago
  It occurs to me that this may be precisely the reason why specialists command higher rates and find it easier to sell their services: Specialization is a risk. Sometimes it's a big risk. The reason why you pay extra for a specialist in $FIELD_X is that you're compensating that expert for having taken the risk of specializing in $FIELD_X. There were NeXTSTEP programming experts in 1998. Those people sure ended up hitting the jackpot, though nobody could have predicted it at the time. I assure you that there were also AOLServer Tcl programming experts in 1998. Nobody remembers them. :] (At least, not for that.) This line of thinking makes me wonder if the standard "be a specialist" advice is yet another example of sample bias: Because the lucky and successful specialists make money, stay in business, and eventually retire and spend their time writing articles and talks about how great it is to be a specialist, we may think specialization is a better idea than it actually is. Make sure to balance your approach by talking to some of the poor folks who specialized in Pascal programming, or Palm WebOS. Or ask an expert Flash programmer how they feel about the rise of the iPad. Keep your escape routes handy!

larrik 15y ago

"Do not limit your CV to one page. If your experience spans more than 3 years or more than 3 jobs then you need details and it's madness to limit yourself to one page in this situation." My interpretation was always that the "one page resume" rule was aimed at new college grads, since they may be more likely to ramble on (and their experience barely matters anyway). The problem is that they don't realize after they get a real job that they shouldn't (necessarily) follow this rule anymore.

Peroni 15y ago
The problem is that they don't realize after they get a real job that they shouldn't (necessarily) follow this rule anymore. Absolutely spot on. A grad will struggle to fill two pages but once you have some bit of experience you really should disregard that rule.
- mseebach 15y ago
  I assume you should aim to keep it succinct, though? I've interviewed a guy who literally listed the names of the methods on an API he'd developed. I think he clocked in a 6-7 pages for a three year career. Surprising as he came through a recruiter, I'd assume a recruiter would provide some CV critique.
  - Peroni 15y ago
    Chances are the recruiter hadn't a clue what he was looking at. He would have been too afraid to edit it as he had no idea where to start. That sort of info is fine on your personal site which you can link to from your CV but to include it all on your formal CV is madness. Personally I think 3 pages, 4 max if you are a contractor is more than enough.

iCococabana 15y ago

Nothing about this posts addresses the fact that, unlike other authors, companies will steal your work and claim your IP, in exchange for a pathetic salary. That means no royalties on million-dollar applications. Suckers!

illumen 15y ago

Prove you the have skills. That's the shortest piece of advice I could think of on the matter that works.

alexshye 15y ago
Agreed. To add on to that, I'd say have skills, have a good network that knows it, and don't be an asshole.

deleted 15y ago

[deleted]

snorkel 15y ago

I've had to hire many hackers myself so I'll cut to the chase for you: * RESUME ACCEPTANCE IS BASED ON KEYWORDS: If your resume does not inlcude the SAME KEYWORDS MENTIONED IN THE JOB POSTING then it gets tossed aside. if (posting.keywords() != resume.keywords()) { resume.destroy(); continue; } Are hiring managers really this stupid and shallow?! YES!!! All of them!!! HR reps are even twice as shallow because HR doesn't know the meaning of the keywords! * If the job posting says "Scrum" and your resume says "Agile" then you edit your resume and change that word to say "Scrum". * If the job posting says "Django" and your resume says "many popular Python frameworks" then you edit your resume to say "Django" * If job posting says "Ruby" and you put "Rails" ... guess what you should do about it? * Skip the cover letter. This is not an essay contest. Nobody reads this. * Top of resume: BRIEF two sentence description of your typical role on a technical team and the type of role are seeking. * Next item of resume: Bullet point list of skills and experience. Keyword A, Keyword B, Keyword C ... remarkably similar to the job posting. What a coincidence! * Remainder of resume: Employment history. Short descriptions. Everything you ever worked on is boring so don't get into details. Don't exceed 3 pages. ACTUAL RESUME HACKS: * Fill employment gaps decreasing the time scale. Instead of Month/Year next to each job, just put the year. Nobody cares if you weren't working between April and August so don't draw attention to it. * If your GPA sucks then don't mention it. Nobody cares about your GPA unless you have no work history to speak of. * Don't mention unrelated jobs in your work history. If your spent a year as a galley cook on oil rig then mention that under hobbies, not work history. It makes you seem like a transient to have a lot of odd unrelated jobs that don't follow the theme of this job posting. * Non-paying jobs are still jobs. If you worked on your uncle's business web site for free while looking for a job, and you had to build the web site, then put it in your work history if you need it to fill the gap. Technical work is still work. If later on someone verifies your work history tell them it was an unpaid volunteer. Nobody cares. * Isn't omitting the truth lying? If this is how you feel then don't bother applying for marketing jobs. Ask a marketing person to tweak your resume for you. Explain to them you are a technical person who only has a binary understanding of truth. * Send your resume as a PDF attachment. Everyone can open a PDF. Not everyone has the latest greatest version of Word. If your skill set matches, and you can prove your skills, then don't put things on your resume that will kill the deal. The resume makes the introduction, it is your calling card, it is your marketing. List the skills you have that they want. Your resume not your complete autobiography or a place to confess your gaps and incompetencies.

wesleyb 15y ago

This is how I found my first job (straight out of college, industry had crashed in south africa after the .99 bomb, I had been looking for a while but no luck). This is what I eventually came up with, you decide if it's how hackers find a job. - I put an ad in a popular job seeker's rag. It cost a pretty penny, but the end result was worth it. - The ad was not as a job seeker, but as an employer - The employer, of course, was fake but I described the kind of company that I wanted to work at - I then listed credentials and traits similar to mine, for this was the person my false company was looking for (in the end looking for someone like me upped my chances of success) - I put an email and a fax number, where they could send resume's. I insisted on references being passed through. - Naturally, my fax ran out of paper, me email box was flooded. - I screened the resume's of the candidates, paying particular attention to their previous employers, eventually picking the one I wanted to work for - I then phoned the few candidates selected and asked them about their previous job (all the while still pretending to be a potential employer -- it sucks, but I was running out of hope and really wanted a good job!) - I finally picked the one that loved his previous job but decided to leave because he had done everything to be done there - I phoned the reference provided in his resume` "Hi, this is Wesley. I met so-and-so at a party on the weekend, he mentioned you may be looking for devs that are x, y and z" Enter my first job.

Peroni 15y ago
Innovative but unethical and highly illegal in the UK.

davesims 15y ago

I disagree with OP's advice about the job boards. Yes, you will be inundated by cattle-call outsourced call centers. Yes, 90% of them will be: URGENT NEED 6 MO CONTRACT 8+ yr experienced J2EE 35.52/HR. Totally annoying. My advice: get over it. You want a job, right? Why limit yourself? Where's the harm? Learning to sniff out the bad recruiters from good is a pretty essential skill in this business. I have really good relationships with a handful of recruiters I met this way that are experienced, professional, genuinely interested in my career and not interested in mismatching. Yeah, I had to get burned a couple of times, and yes I've had to learn to filter out the cattle call, code monkey staff aug stuff. And it's great. Once you learn to filter and know the good recruiters from bad (tone of voice in the first 30 seconds usually gives it away) you'll find that in the 10% non-crap calls are usually lurking some good opportunities. Flip this around to the recruiter's perspective. 99% of their candidates and contacts are crap as well. If you actually know what you're doing and have a decent resume, there's a significant percentage of these recruiters who will be thrilled to find you and may actually have some interesting work, if not now, down the line. This has happened for me on a number of occasions. If you want to avoid annoyances, by all means avoid the job boards. But if you're on the market, don't limit your options by snobbery or fear of annoyance. Learn to filter your calls and sift through the dross -- there may be a great opportunity in there if you're patient.

Peroni 15y ago
All completely valid advice however most find job boards a chore so my advice is designed to be a preemptive measure to save people from the standard route of job boards.

cHalgan 15y ago

I think the main problem is that in brave new world of "connection is everything" landing job is really really hard if you just sending resume thru HR/normal process. If nothing you should always edit resume based on the job posting (so you can match lingo used in the posting) - but chances that the resume will land on managers desk is near zero (it like sending unsolicited business plan to VCs...) The most efficient way to land the job it to establish direct contact with hiring manager (or somebody in the team). I.e., pay $50 for linkedin so you can send email directly saying exactly what you want ...

skrebbel 15y ago

It's a good thing that Silicon Valley = The World, because otherwise half this post wouldn't have made any sense. HN's "Who's hiring" thread, yeah that works. And I think the amount of hiring managers in the Netherlands who know Github is below 10. Sure, some years may fix this, but right now, the advice in this blog is painfully regionally specific.

Peroni 15y ago
Funnily enough I'm based in London and a lot of the advice is UK-centric. Granted Github has limited exposure outside of the US & the UK but I am not versed on Dutch standards so I'm afraid I would struggle to offer advice!

known 15y ago

Writing software (hacker) != Selling software (MBA) != Selling consulting (Bodyshopping)