3 ms·

What does that imply?

• 7495743 5y ago
  That they are very keen on not having a board of auditors because there is something they think those auditors could do they don't want done. For instance, uncover corruption.
  • throwaway98797 5y ago
    or they are lazy
  • Aeolun 5y ago
    Or, you know, they still have the same accounting firm, and the situation hasn’t changed at all since last time. Only this auditor is more persistent.
    • 7495743 5y ago
      I don't think it's reasonable to believe they are ignoring the law just because they are lazy or think the accounting firm makes the auditors unnecessary. If they didn't care, they would just swear in auditors and let them preform their other duties as the law requires.