3 ms·
Not just numbers, but numbers we can trust. I've been really impressed with how much data my province (Alberta) has made available, but now, I'm wondering. Th
by armagon 5y ago
Not just numbers, but numbers we can trust.
I've been really impressed with how much data my province (Alberta) has made available, but now, I'm wondering.
They recently had "technical difficulties", and the numbers changed from showing that double-vaxxed people were the most at-risk for omicron, to showing that unvaxxed people are. https://twitter.com/AB_CovidFacts/status/1486112498977685506 https://twitter.com/AB_CovidFacts/status/1486112498977685506
Also disturbing is that, if you get vaccinated and have issues within the first 14 days, they count you as being unvaccinated in all the reports: https://metatron.substack.com/p/alberta-just-inadvertently-confessed https://metatron.substack.com/p/alberta-just-inadvertently-c...
- mathwords 5y ago
- dang 5y agoCould you please not create accounts to break HN's rules with? We ban those (I've banned this one), and it's not in your interests to do so. The only reason why HN is worth anything in the first place—and it must be worth something, or you wouldn't be here—is if it's interesting, and flamewar destroys interestingness.
- knownjorbist 5y agoIs there a reasonable explanation for the revised numbers without delving into conspiracies?
- nonethewiser 5y ago>Is there a reasonable explanation for the revised numbers without delving into conspiracies? Why are you assuming these are mutually exclusive? Governments are famous for nothing if not conspiring.