I would say they are not even that, not by a long shot, since they are unable to evaluate context. It is more probable that content is offensive when vulgar lan

I would say they are not even that, not by a long shot, since they are unable to evaluate context. It is more probable that content is offensive when vulgar language is present, but that doesn't have to be the case. Delegating content control to an AI (that doesn't qualify for anything intelligent) is not a working solution. > as a first-pass filter, leaving final judgments to human decision makers — marking all profanity as toxic can make perfect sense You would need humans to look at profanity constantly. > Our mission involves creating a safer Internet, but we don’t want to miss out on our favorite content because of AI flaws in the meantime. There is a limited AIs that do create content, but a profanity filter always does the exact opposite.