3 ms·
The way I see it: in both cases, people with decision-making power made decisions, in keeping with established precedent and aiming for a desired outcome. Also
by tadfisher 5y ago
The way I see it: in both cases, people with decision-making power made decisions, in keeping with established precedent and aiming for a desired outcome. Also in both cases, a minority of those not involved in the decision-making process have raised bad-faith arguments and managed to convince the rest of the world that there is a controversy in how the decisions were made and carried out, and that the decision-making power should never have been delegated in the first place.
- raxxorrax 5y agoWhat about those that did make argument in good faith? To attribute bad faith to an argument would not fly in any serious discussion. Isn't the topic serious enough? (Moreso covid than systemd).