> which is discussed in multiple sources, but we’ll go with the Science Based Medicine blog I read the entire linked article. This is not a neutral summary, an

> which is discussed in multiple sources, but we’ll go with the Science Based Medicine blog I read the entire linked article. This is not a neutral summary, and one should not "just go with it". The author is a psychiatrist, and he has a pretty clear bias: most of the words in the article are spent equivocating on severity, despite the author saying that he doesn't have the necessary background to judge: > As a neurologist and psychiatrist, I view the heart as a pump to deliver blood to the brain, so I am a bit out of my territory when discussing whether or not myocarditis can be “mild”. This is the medical version of "IANAL" (which is always followed by legal advice...) For a balanced view on this issue, I like Walid Gelad, who is a professor of medicine at Pitt, an expert in drug regulatory process, and has been vocal on the topic of regulatory approval of booster doses for children: https://twitter.com/walidgellad https://twitter.com/walidgellad