4 ms·
Typical red tape bureaucracy where some people who propose they know better and believe they are to decide who discriminates against whom. The last 20 years ci
by raxxorrax 5y ago
Typical red tape bureaucracy where some people who propose they know better and believe they are to decide who discriminates against whom.
The last 20 years civil liberties were made into a joke with anti-terror legislation. Some overextended bureaucrats believe they can counter these self-imposed developments by being the savior of womanhood, but nobody would propose discrimination in jobs that aren't prestigious. It is a complete paper tiger an lawfare. I fully believe judges will make decisions against the letter of the law, they are a suboptimal safeguard for civil liberties by now. They just legislate an exception and these clauses suddenly have no values anymore. Some people also thought humanism must be improved by making sex and race an issue again.
Companies might like to comply so that nobody looks closer at their business models.