8 ms·
> It's still not quite enough (given the lack of strong epidemiological evidence) to make any arguments for or against 5G. Definitely not. But to me it’s enoug
by nickysielicki 5y ago
> It's still not quite enough (given the lack of strong epidemiological evidence) to make any arguments for or against 5G.
Definitely not. But to me it’s enough to give the benefit of the doubt to the author and keep reading, even when they carelessly overstate the risk.
- dekhn 5y agoThe author publishes roughly the same article in several venues on an annual basis, but interestingly, there is absolutely zero high quality epidemiological evidence supporting his position. Even at Berkeley he's a bit of an outsider with this position.