That is not possible if some people believe that government is infallible. That is a wrong axiom to take. On the contrary, I think the UK had government officia

That is not possible if some people believe that government is infallible. That is a wrong axiom to take. On the contrary, I think the UK had government officials involved here. Handling of political dissent also is not optimal in many states and it tends to get worse the last 1-2 decades. To fight for safety and against terror while living in the safest time in history. It will never be enough for some and those people need clear red lines. Most constitutions have those, but careless lawyers found some ways to ignore those so that they mostly become meaningless. If you have a bad conscience of neglecting your children, maybe start spending time with them instead of endangering secure communications. Most cases of child abuse isn't inflicted by strangers, even less so through the internet. There is a measurable effect that mass surveillance has on many people and it already has a significant negative effect on trust towards state institutions. Self inflicted mostly. No dialogue shall be had, encryption is a technology that is available to all. Maybe we should restrict governments because they have to provide transparency.