> but why does Zucc think facebook's checkers are superior to the BMJ Because they are his fact checkers. It isn't an argument against Zuckerberg or a condemna

> but why does Zucc think facebook's checkers are superior to the BMJ Because they are his fact checkers. It isn't an argument against Zuckerberg or a condemnation, this is just the obvious explanation. Whoever came up with the concept of fact checkers plainly wanted to establish some form of authoritative voice or judge. I believe the concept is futile and the motives often dishonest. It will not work for whatever reason though.