4 ms·
It is absolutely wildly different. "Evaluating a library", "reading the documentation", etc., is absolutely NOT the same as basing your calculations on a hundre
by slingnow 5y ago
It is absolutely wildly different. "Evaluating a library", "reading the documentation", etc., is absolutely NOT the same as basing your calculations on a hundred+ years of rigorously proven methods and deeper physical truths. How could you possibly infer that these are the same thing?
- skrtskrt 5y agosoftware engineering is a younger discipline, we don’t have hundreds of years yet. You seem to think that our understanding of CPU operation or distributed systems isn’t based on physical truth and rigorous testing. Also a programming language or library or whatever has often been deployed by tens of thousands of organizations, across tens if millions of deployments, across trillions of discrete times the code path has been hit, and we know how it acts. That’s rigorous in its own way