3 ms·
How perfect is the play that piosolver calculates? Do you make any simplifying assumptions? I noticed in the article that piosolver can incorporate a mixed str
by im3w1l 5y ago
How perfect is the play that piosolver calculates? Do you make any simplifying assumptions?
I noticed in the article that piosolver can incorporate a mixed strategy with multiple bet sizes. Pretty neat, is that a recent feature? As I rememember it, a few years back people would discuss what the optimal bet size was in various situations with the implicit assumption that there is just one.
- bluecalm 5y agoAdding multiple betsizes was one of the first features we added in 2015 - so not very recent, no. The one true correct bet size is a seducing idea but that just doesn't exist for most situations. You can try finding the best one with the assumption you can only use one but it's not the best idea in my opinion. Main reasons are that that's the sizing most people will be most ready to play against and EV difference between possible bet sizes is minimal. What happened in chess is now happening in poker: at first people were all about the best theoretical move and then gradual shift to "not necessary the best just sound enough but less likely to be analyzed by the opponents" started happening. As to the first part of your question: the solutions are pretty much perfect. The only assumption is about possible bet sizes. As to accuracy we measure it in theoretical exploitability (how much a perfect adversary who knows our strategy exactly could win against us). You can easily go so low that even a theoretical perfect adversary wouldn't get close to beating the rake vs the solution, even at high stakes.
- deleted 5y ago[deleted]