3 ms·
In my personal opinion the modification is insubstantial so for copyright purposes you haven't created a derivative work. There are probably ways you could make
by pbhjpbhj 5y ago
In my personal opinion the modification is insubstantial so for copyright purposes you haven't created a derivative work. There are probably ways you could make it substantial but how would the rights holders ever know. It might technically be a tort but there's no damage; what would a rights holder win?
- nybble41 5y ago> It might technically be a tort but there's no damage; what would a rights holder win? Statutory damages. Which highlights the essential flaw in allowing statutory damages.