3 ms·
I think you might be confusing the podcast host with his guests. Rogan isn’t someone claiming medical expertise or authority. His guests, on the other hand, ar
by no-dr-onboard 5y ago
I think you might be confusing the podcast host with his guests. Rogan isn’t someone claiming medical expertise or authority.
His guests, on the other hand, are often well qualified to make their statements.
- netizen-936824 5y agoHow about Dr. Oz? Just as a singular example of a medical doctor who consistently promotes quackery and he's definitely not alone
- version_five 5y agoDr. Oz is obviously a harmful quack / charletton. He should be called out at every opportunity, but he should definitely be allowed to continue to promote himself. Our civic duty is to make fun of him (or at least his ideas), not to censor him.
- netizen-936824 5y agoI do agree that we shouldn't censor, and continue to call out the quackery. My point in bringing up Dr. Oz was to give an example of a medical professional who should not be trusted when it comes to the way they give credence to bad ideas and methodology. Just because Joe Rogan's guests have credentials doesn't mean that the ideas they bring to the table are automatically good.