5 ms·
Not necessarily. If your code is in English, and your category does not exist in English (like this Chinese word described here), then I do not see how to do be
by 317070 5y ago
Not necessarily. If your code is in English, and your category does not exist in English (like this Chinese word described here), then I do not see how to do better than this salad.
How would you have named this class?
- macleginn 5y agoOne option (not necessarily a better one) is to use standard notation for kin relationships that basically show how to traverse the tree starting from ego: https://www.kintip.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=35&Itemid=202&limitstart=3 https://www.kintip.net/index.php?option=com_content&view=art...
- Jcowell 5y agoFamily trees are not trees but graphs.
- malka 5y agoacyclic graphs, hopefully
- dankent 5y agoSee the German TV show Dark for in interesting take on what could happen if they somehow became cyclic.
- mrlonglong 5y agoSeconded! Quite bizzare it was, a fun bingeing session a few years back.
- jfk13 5y agoSee also https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I'm_My_Own_Grandpa https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/I'm_My_Own_Grandpa
- naniwaduni 5y agoWell, family graphs including relationships by marriage and adoption are not in general acyclic.
- LudwigNagasena 5y agoI don’t see how it would help to dispose of “or”. It would just make it less readable.