3 ms·
> If it catches ANY bugs it is objectively better than no PR/code-review from a bug standpoint. No, that's false. That's only true if you also assume that peop
by Abroszka 5y ago
> If it catches ANY bugs it is objectively better than no PR/code-review from a bug standpoint.
No, that's false. That's only true if you also assume that people write the same quality code whether there is a code review process or not. Which might or might not be true, no idea.
- cunac 5y agoif anything I would think that person would write same code but without PR would lost the opportunity of having better quality. People are blind to own mistakes. I can't count how many times I would stare at a code not seeing something and other person would spot problem almost immediately.