4 ms·

But those extra people are choosing to be there so there must be some benefit.

• seanmcdirmid 5y ago
  > But those extra people are choosing to be there so there must be some benefit. As long as your roads are saturated, they have less throughput, not more. It is kind of like a clog in your toilet: more things are there in your pipes, but not much is getting through.
  • throwaway0a5e 5y ago
    A clogged toilet isn't flowing. More like dumping a 5-gal bucket into a sink . The drain is running at full capacity but any one drop may take a long time to actually clear the sink. The 5-gal bucket is peak demand. Total time to sink clear is how long rush "hour" lasts. Fluid analogies are crappy because fluids flow more when you add pressure and traffic doesn't.
    • seanmcdirmid 5y ago
      > because fluids flow more when you add pressure and traffic doesn't. Well, traffic can flow when pressure is added, just not in a way that is very safe.
  • jimmaswell 5y ago
    If your city sewer is clogged, so you widen it, then more people install toilets in their houses and bring the sewer back to capacity, I think that's still a win.
• tshaddox 5y ago
  They're choosing to be there now, precisely like they were choosing to not be there before you changed the roads. Other people are also choosing to not be there, and instead choosing to live in the woods in northern Canada. I'm not sure how this mode of argument is really demonstrating anything. It seems like you just considering literally any state of affairs other than active physical coercion to be a good state of affairs.